On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Tim Janik wrote:
> the plan for that was to send out en email next friday/saturday (i.e
> right at the guadec start) to figure/suggest dates suitable for
> everyone to attend.
we have gotten a room for the Gtk+ meeting now.
it's on Sunday the 25th from 16:00-18:00 in the blue
Hi Matthias,
> The online documentation is still at 2.9.2. I hope to find time
> to update it to 2.9.4 before leaving for GUADEC tomorrow.
Please warn us when the online API documentation regarding new symbols
is fully freezed for 2.10 so that we can start working on adding the
new symbols in bin
Hi Murray;
On Thu, 2006-06-22 at 20:44 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > The action code itself is one hundred lines long and can easily be
> > hidden inside an helper file; it's approximately how GtkRecentAction
> > would be implemented, anyway. I hereby give permission to do whatever
> > you w
On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 01:05 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Hi Murray,
>
> On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 10:52 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > I'm also concerned about the recent files stuff. Do we now have
> > UIManager integration of that?
>
> No, and I am to blame because I had less time to spend on
;
> Date: Jun 17, 2006 7:22 PM
> Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.10, the endgame
> To: Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
>
>
> On 6/15/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Therefore, I want to consider 2.9.3 api frozen, and take a
On Sun, 2006-06-18 at 20:19 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote:
> Yes!
> Please could you implement a help button in the
> filechooser. The documentation is already written and
> is ready to be linked to.
Do we have a mechanism for this? I see that GtkColorSelectionDialog
creates a Help button but hid
> Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 18:57:54 +0200
> From: Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: GtkFileChooser/GnomeVFS backend still
> > Are there other important bugs or regressions that
> need
> > attention before 2.10 ?
Yes!
Please could you implement a help button in the
filechooser. The do
On 6/15/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Therefore, I want to consider 2.9.3 api frozen, and take a
Does this mean that
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/ix07.html (and equivalents
for gdk, pango, atk) is now a fully stable source for bindings which
want to support new fea
Am Donnerstag, den 15.06.2006, 09:56 -0400 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> I want to have GTK+ 2.10 ready at or immediately after GUADEC.
>
> I did not declare 2.9.3 api frozen in the release announcement,
> because we were still holding the door open for Kris' work on
> the new tooltips api. But he ha
Hi Murray,
On Fri, 2006-06-16 at 10:52 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> I'm also concerned about the recent files stuff. Do we now have
> UIManager integration of that?
No, and I am to blame because I had less time to spend on fixing this
issue.
Mostly, I've been stuck on how to implement an actio
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:56 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I want to have GTK+ 2.10 ready at or immediately after GUADEC.
[snip]
I'd rather it was after rather than before. That gives us just a little
more time to get everything wrapped quickly for gtkmm, which might show
some small problems that
I'm also concerned about the recent files stuff. Do we now have
UIManager integration of that?
--
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/
Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
>On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:56 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
>
>>- The print backends need a careful look wrt to memory leaks
>> and error reporting.
>>
>>
>
>I'm rather worried of declaring the printing API as stable and just
>unleashing it to the world. Is a
Hubert Figuiere skrev:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> I want to have GTK+ 2.10 ready at or immediately after GUADEC.
>
> Can somebody summarize the Mac port status?
The basic functionality is implemented and what's next in the pipeline
is bug fixing, and after that looking into tighter integration
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 11:50 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:56 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>
> > Therefore, I want to consider 2.9.3 api frozen, and take a
> > look at what still needs to happen before 2.10. Here are some
> > things I personally would like get wo
On Thu, 2006-06-15 at 09:56 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Therefore, I want to consider 2.9.3 api frozen, and take a
> look at what still needs to happen before 2.10. Here are some
> things I personally would like get worked on (not sure
> how much time I can free to look into these myself):
>
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I want to have GTK+ 2.10 ready at or immediately after GUADEC.
Can somebody summarize the Mac port status?
Hub
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I want to have GTK+ 2.10 ready at or immediately after GUADEC.
> Another thing I have slacked off about is organizing a GTK+
> team meeting at GUADEC. So, who of the GTK+ team is there
> and at what times ? Should we try to find a free hour during
> t
I want to have GTK+ 2.10 ready at or immediately after GUADEC.
I did not declare 2.9.3 api frozen in the release announcement,
because we were still holding the door open for Kris' work on
the new tooltips api. But he has run into some difficulties
with the implementation which will take some time
19 matches
Mail list logo
