hi Benjamin;
it's going to be a long email... :-)
On 2011-09-06 at 14:26, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> Emmanuele Bassi gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > a) drop GTK+, move to Clutter and port the complex widges over;
> > b) re-implement Clutter inside GTK+;
> > c) use Clutter between GDK and GTK+;
> >
Exciting topic.
Just a few comments scattered through the email...
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 14:26 +, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> Emmanuele Bassi gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > a) drop GTK+, move to Clutter and port the complex widges over;
> > b) re-implement Clutter inside GTK+;
> > c) use Clutt
Emmanuele Bassi gmail.com> writes:
>
> a) drop GTK+, move to Clutter and port the complex widges over;
> b) re-implement Clutter inside GTK+;
> c) use Clutter between GDK and GTK+;
>
I would translate that as:
a) tell GTK developers their code is crap
b) tell Clutter developers their code i
hi;
On 2011-09-01 at 11:18, Andres G. Aragoneses wrote:
> Small question Emanuelle:
>
> On 08/31/2011 04:10 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> >...
> >Giovanni Campagna recently submitted a GDK backend for Clutter[0] which
> >I'm fairly keen on merging during 1.9 (the cycle for Gnome 3.4) and
> >usin
Small question Emanuelle:
On 08/31/2011 04:10 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Giovanni Campagna recently submitted a GDK backend for Clutter[0]which
> I'm fairly keen on merging during 1.9 (the cycle for Gnome 3.4) and
> using as the default backend when compiled on X11.
Oh, does that mean that a
[Cc:ing clutter-devel-list, but IMNSHO the discussion should happen on
gtk-devel-list; I'm subscribed to both so please don't Cc: me - I don't
need three copies]
hi all;
during the Desktop Summit in Berlin there have been multiple talks about
the future of GTK+ and Clutter.
part of the discussio
