Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-26 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
If i understand correctly, the issue which prevents gtk+ in trunk from building with the directfb backend should be the fact that some months ago the gdk backends were updated to use the new gdk_window_impl_iface_init set of pointers to functions. At least, this is what i understod by looking a

Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-23 Thread Robert Schwebel
Hi Arun, On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 08:24:30PM +0530, Arun Patole wrote: > Can you please let us know if the patches posted to this list on > feb-16 is the complete set that should make my latest gtk+ up on > directFb?? I suppose most of the hackers will be busy with eating penguin cookies these day

Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-23 Thread Arun Patole
Hi Denis, Can you please let us know if the patches posted to this list on feb-16 is the complete set that should make my latest gtk+ up on directFb?? Thanks, Arun On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 5:29 PM, Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:34:26PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > As

Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-22 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 12:34:26PM -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > As far as I know there's a set of patches from Denis Oliver Kropp, the > > main DirectFB developer, that are waiting to be merged to trunk. Denis > > sent his patches to this list on 16 Feb 2008. > > Someone who cares about the di

Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-21 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Sun, Dec 21, 2008 at 10:14 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 16:54 +0100, Christian Dywan wrote: > >> The latest Gtk+ for DirectFB is broken because nobody who uses DirectFB >> stepped up to bring it back in shape. I've seen countless attempts at >> using it but nobody who

Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-21 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 16:54 +0100, Christian Dywan wrote: > The latest Gtk+ for DirectFB is broken because nobody who uses DirectFB > stepped up to bring it back in shape. I've seen countless attempts at > using it but nobody who was up to fix it. As far as I know there's a set of patches fr

Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-21 Thread Arun Patole
Well, the fix i applied may not be the proper one, i just wanted see it getting build. Build was broken with multiple definition of many symbols. when looked at code, i found many function declared in both gdk/gdkwindow.c and gdk/directfb/gdkwindow-difectfb.c. and both files were used for building

Re: Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-19 Thread Christian Dywan
Am Fri, 19 Dec 2008 20:52:18 +0530 schrieb "Arun Patole" : > Hi All, > > Is the latest GTK+ up to date for building with DirectFB? I tried > building it but failed with some multiple definition errors. after > resolving them, small demo example crashes. > > Do i have to apply any patches to use

Gtk+ on DirectFb (sample example fails with "DirectFb/Fbdev Caught Signal 11")

2008-12-19 Thread Arun Patole
Hi All, Is the latest GTK+ up to date for building with DirectFB? I tried building it but failed with some multiple definition errors. after resolving them, small demo example crashes. Do i have to apply any patches to use gtk+ successfully on directFB?? I have built gtk+ on directFb 1.2 and tri