On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 15:37 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 19:47 +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Last week, I have seen that GTK+ 3.0 has drop the DirectFB backend
because no maintainer was carrying it (which I wasn't aware of).
that's frankly odd, since the backend
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 19:47 +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Last week, I have seen that GTK+ 3.0 has drop the DirectFB backend
because no maintainer was carrying it (which I wasn't aware of).
that's frankly odd, since the backend has been known to be broken since
the 2.14 release, which
Le dimanche 05 septembre 2010 à 15:37 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit :
start by maintaining a clone of the gtk+ repository, reinstating the
backend, making it work and *keeping up* with the changes in master.
before 3.0, or 3.2, it can be re-evaluated if the dfb backend should
once again be
Hello everyone,
Pushing back the DirectFB subject again.
Last week, I have seen that GTK+ 3.0 has drop the DirectFB backend
because no maintainer was carrying it (which I wasn't aware of).
This week Sven pushed the patches I made for GTK+ 2.22. I would really
like to see GTK+ work well on
