On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:57 -0700, Jason Hickey wrote:
I am developing a GTK+ binding for OMake (http://omake.metaprl.org).
OMake has a functional language, so it has closures, etc.
Am I missing something, or is it not possible to deal with closures
in GtkActionEntry?
GtkActionEntry
On May 27, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
in this particular case, the data passed to the callback is the one
you
pass to gtk_action_group_add_actions():
void gtk_action_group_add_actions (GtkActionGroup
*action_group,
const
I am developing a GTK+ binding for OMake (http://omake.metaprl.org).
OMake has a functional language, so it has closures, etc.
Pardon me if I am daft, but,
- One cannot simply pass a GClosure where a GCallback is expected
(!?).
GTK+ is usually nice--each signal can be paired with data,
On 5/26/07, Jason Hickey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am developing a GTK+ binding for OMake (http://omake.metaprl.org).
OMake has a functional language, so it has closures, etc.
Pardon me if I am daft, but,
- One cannot simply pass a GClosure where a GCallback is expected
(!?).
GTK+ is
