On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 21:29 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
snip
Pascal's patch just wasn't very far along...he said so himself when he
attached it.
I reviewed it and he never came back to it. I waited until SoC was
over to not step
on his toes, and then reworked his patch myself. My reworked
Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 00:39 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Hi
I have been doing some work on adding RandR 1.2 support to GTK+. There
is an initial patch here:
http://www.gnome.org/~ssp/randr/gtk.patch
Was that based on the patch in
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 21:15 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 00:39 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Hi
I have been doing some work on adding RandR 1.2 support to GTK+. There
is an initial patch here:
On Nov 21, 2007 7:46 PM, Bastien Nocera [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's the same API, but the code is different. I'll post it to
bugzilla.
Mind explaining what's different? Did you use the code in the bug as a
starting point, or is it completely new code? If it's all new code, what
was so
Hi
I have been doing some work on adding RandR 1.2 support to GTK+. There
is an initial patch here:
http://www.gnome.org/~ssp/randr/gtk.patch
The interesting part is perhaps the API:
A new signal on GdkScreen:
void (*monitors_changed) (GdkScreen *screen);
that is emitted whenever
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 00:39 +0100, Soeren Sandmann wrote:
Hi
I have been doing some work on adding RandR 1.2 support to GTK+. There
is an initial patch here:
http://www.gnome.org/~ssp/randr/gtk.patch
Was that based on the patch in the bugzilla:
On 21 Nov 2007 00:39:29 +0100, Soeren Sandmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments appreciated.
Looks pretty close to what Pascal and I had worked out earlier in
bugzilla, so I'd say it looks
fine api wise. The only things that jumped out in the patch were the
debug printfs that are
still in
