On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 00:20 +0200, Philip Chimento wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Matthias Clasen
> wrote:
> > - We need to document how one extends GTK+ itself (eg how to create a
> > new widget class), to make it easier for new people to get involved
> > (I'll try to get this started)
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 07:21 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
> Convince chpe that it is ok to have his comments indexed and I'll gladly
> have Bugzilla indexed.
Sorry, don't know what the context of that is (though if it's about
privacy it sounds rather soft given that, robots.txt or not, the
comments
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 09:22:51AM +1000, Andrew Cowie wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:30 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > - We want to discuss major API proposals or wishes (eg new widgets) on
> > this mailing list, instead of just in bugzilla.
>
> That's terrific. While I wouldn't say that b
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Matthias Clasen
wrote:
> - We need to document how one extends GTK+ itself (eg how to create a
> new widget class), to make it easier for new people to get involved
> (I'll try to get this started)
I wrote a tutorial on extending GtkContainer in C
(http://ptomato.
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:30 +0200, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> - We want to discuss major API proposals or wishes (eg new widgets) on
> this mailing list, instead of just in bugzilla.
That's terrific. While I wouldn't say that bugzilla not in the public
record or anything like that, the fact that it
