Re: webassembly

I don't think we can say Broadway is "dead in the water"; there's a current WIP branch for GTK+ 4 with new features and fixes. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list

Re: webassembly

On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 10:13:45AM +1100, Daniel Kasak wrote: > As for broadway being a 'toy' ... it's a pretty impressive toy, really. It > does everything I wanted, other than copy & paste, and was remarkably > stable. It wouldn't be so attractive if it wasn't damn near impossible to > build

Re: webassembly

While I concede this ( webassembly ) and broadway are most likely dead-in-the-water for gtk+4, there's no harm in me putting my hand up as a possible user, if such things did eventuate. It's probably more likely that a wayland compositor gets welded to an RDP/VNC server and becomes usable? As for

Re: webassembly

Il giorno lun 20 nov 2017 19:23:08 CET, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: On 20 November 2017 at 17:34, Andrea Zagli wrote: Il giorno lun 20 nov 2017 16:02:11 CET, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: Hi; On 20 November 2017 at 14:52, Andrea Zagli via gtk-devel-list

Re: webassembly

On 20 November 2017 at 17:34, Andrea Zagli wrote: > Il giorno lun 20 nov 2017 16:02:11 CET, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: > >> Hi; >> >> On 20 November 2017 at 14:52, Andrea Zagli via gtk-devel-list >> wrote: >>> >>> do you plan to port (i don't know if

Re: webassembly

Il giorno lun 20 nov 2017 16:02:11 CET, Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: Hi; On 20 November 2017 at 14:52, Andrea Zagli via gtk-devel-list wrote: do you plan to port (i don't know if "port" is the right word) glib/gtk to webassembly? There are no plans that I'm aware

Re: webassembly

Hi; On 20 November 2017 at 14:52, Andrea Zagli via gtk-devel-list wrote: > do you plan to port (i don't know if "port" is the right word) glib/gtk to > webassembly? There are no plans that I'm aware of, nor use cases that have materialised that would require such a