Hi,
On 7/2/05, Christian Neumair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 02.07.2005, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Emmanuele Bassi:
> > The CVS got back working, so I've committed the patches...
> >
> > The question stays, though: if we are going to replace the recent-files
> > stuff, I'll have to drop
Am Samstag, den 02.07.2005, 12:22 +0200 schrieb Emmanuele Bassi:
> The CVS got back working, so I've committed the patches...
>
> The question stays, though: if we are going to replace the recent-files
> stuff, I'll have to drop the current code as soon as I put the new
> RecentManager code in.
[
Hi all,
The CVS got back working, so I've committed the patches...
The question stays, though: if we are going to replace the recent-files
stuff, I'll have to drop the current code as soon as I put the new
RecentManager code in.
Kind regards,
Emmanuele.
--
Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
less cleanly to the current code).
I was in the process of applying them, but luckily I do not have write
access to libegg. I say "luckily" because that has given me time to
think about the recent-files status.
First of all: recent-files uses some code from Gnome libraries, name
