On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 12:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:31 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Dumping
> > serialised Javascript objects to the filesystem isn't really elegant
> > either.
>
> It isn't, but for what it's worth that's what I do currently:
> https://git.gnome
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:29 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:31 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Heya,
> >
> > I've started writing a simple database-like application in Javascript
> > using GTK+, and I wondered about what to use for storage.
> >
> > gjs currently doesn't h
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:31 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
>
> I've started writing a simple database-like application in Javascript
> using GTK+, and I wondered about what to use for storage.
>
> gjs currently doesn't have bindings for SQLite, and using intermediate
> bindings like libgda
hi Colin;
On 1 May 2013 09:31, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:31 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Dumping
>> serialised Javascript objects to the filesystem isn't really elegant
>> either.
>
> It isn't, but for what it's worth that's what I do currently:
> https://git.gnome.org/b
On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:31 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Dumping
> serialised Javascript objects to the filesystem isn't really elegant
> either.
It isn't, but for what it's worth that's what I do currently:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gnome-ostree/tree/src/js/jsonutil.js
But this app is basi
Heya,
I've started writing a simple database-like application in Javascript
using GTK+, and I wondered about what to use for storage.
gjs currently doesn't have bindings for SQLite, and using intermediate
bindings like libgda I found too low-level (provider-specific SQL, the
need to write SQL and
