I forgot that GtkWidget::parent already works:
g_object_new (TYPE_FOO, "parent", box, "blah", 42, NULL)
This is a pretty nice solution I think. You don't even have to save a
pointer to the new object if you aren't doing anything other than
adding it to parent and setting a couple of props.
Havoc
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 5:38 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> On the other hand... since g_object_new() will never return NULL...
> I'm not sure how much this api would be different than simply
> invoking these lines of code:
>
> gtk_container_add_with_properties (container,
>
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 10:59 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
> > I like this idea alot and as its a trivial patch I might write one
> > up tonight or tomorrow ...
>
> well, it's trivial except for the need to add some kind of go
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 10:51 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
> > SPREAD_EVEN is exactly that.. adding extra space between the children as
> > spacing, and there is SPREAD_EXPAND for the other (not sure if that
> > could be better
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> SPREAD_EVEN is exactly that.. adding extra space between the children as
> spacing, and there is SPREAD_EXPAND for the other (not sure if that
> could be better explained).
that's what I was saying, just that the docs could use a sm
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> I like this idea alot and as its a trivial patch I might write one
> up tonight or tomorrow ...
well, it's trivial except for the need to add some kind of gobject API
(or you could do it in a somewhat hacky way without that, I think
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 18:32 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > With my proposed padding cleanup though that issue goes away:
> >
> > child = g_object_new(TYPE_MYCHILD, "padding", 5, "h-align",
> > GTK_ALIGN_FILL_HORIZONTAL, NULL);
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 22:07 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> While I'm making trivial comments about wrap box - there's START/END
> in several other enums, rather than BEGIN/END (just look through
> gtkenums.h, wrap box is the only BEGIN)
>
> @GTK_WRAP_BOX_SPREAD_EVEN description says "evenly dist
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> With my proposed padding cleanup though that issue goes away:
>
> child = g_object_new(TYPE_MYCHILD, "padding", 5, "h-align",
> GTK_ALIGN_FILL_HORIZONTAL, NULL);
> insert_child(layout, child, 2, GTK_WRAP_BOX_PACK_Y_EXPAND);
>
Really
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 18:20 -0400, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 08/24/10 13:42, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> > Is this a kind of widget that we are interested in adding to GTK+ ?
>
> What are the usecases for such a container? The selection of features looks a
> bit arbitrary to me.
I wanted it fo
While I'm making trivial comments about wrap box - there's START/END
in several other enums, rather than BEGIN/END (just look through
gtkenums.h, wrap box is the only BEGIN)
@GTK_WRAP_BOX_SPREAD_EVEN description says "evenly distributed between
children" which I think means "as spacing between chi
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> I think "guint" here is just misleading; it's not like you can use
> UINT_MAX, GTK uses signed int for most layout internally to avoid
> screwy bugs caused by subtraction ending up < 0.
> Also public API like set_size_request and GtkS
it'd be great to avoid the GtkBox stuff I was whining about in the
padding thread, e.g.
void egg_wrap_box_insert_child (EggWrapBox
*layout,
GtkWidget
*widget,
On 08/24/10 13:42, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> Is this a kind of widget that we are interested in adding to GTK+ ?
What are the usecases for such a container? The selection of features looks a
bit arbitrary to me.
behdad
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
>
> I'm happy that this was so well received :)
>
> Maybe a decent property name alternative could be:
> "minimum-line-children"/"natural-line-children"
>
> "minimum-children-per-line" would fit the description
> but seems to me absurdly long w
Oops I sent this privately to Hans earlier without CCing the list.
Forwarded Message
From: Tristan Van Berkom
To: Hans Breuer
Subject: Re: Wrapping Box Container
Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 11:53:53 +0900
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 23:09 +0200, Hans Breuer wrote:
> At 24.08.2010 20
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 20:20 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 02:42 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> > [...]
> >> PS: I've been trying to send this mail all day, at this point from
> >> several email addresses..
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 02:42 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> [...]
>> PS: I've been trying to send this mail all day, at this point from
>> several email addresses... I'm dropping the .tgz attachment and will
>> follow up with another
At 24.08.2010 20:31, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
Hi developers,
Last week I was busy writing up a new container
widget for GTK+ and would like to propose it for
inclusion in 3.0.
Hey, sounds like a useful addition. I've actually had it
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:42 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
wrote:
> Hi developers,
> Last week I was busy writing up a new container
> widget for GTK+ and would like to propose it for
> inclusion in 3.0.
Hey, sounds like a useful addition. I've actually had it somewhere
deep on my todo list to look at
I'm not even reading the whole email:
+1 !!! :-)
2010/8/24 Tristan Van Berkom :
> On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 02:42 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> [...]
>> PS: I've been trying to send this mail all day, at this point from
>> several email addresses... I'm dropping the .tgz attachment and will
>> fo
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 02:42 +0900, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
[...]
> PS: I've been trying to send this mail all day, at this point from
> several email addresses... I'm dropping the .tgz attachment and will
> follow up with another mail after uploading it somewhere if this email
> does indeed hit t
22 matches
Mail list logo
