Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-05-22 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Matthias Clasen ha scritto: > On 3/28/07, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> i believe it would be nice if someone could sync directfb backend in >> trunk with stable release: all that's in trunk can be safely backported >> into 2.10 (also some autofile sysnc is needed). >> I sadly

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-05-22 Thread Matthias Clasen
On 3/28/07, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i believe it would be nice if someone could sync directfb backend in > trunk with stable release: all that's in trunk can be safely backported > into 2.10 (also some autofile sysnc is needed). > I sadly cannot do it by myself as i have n

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-29 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Kalle Vahlman ha scritto: > 2007/3/28, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> BTW, the directfb gnome bug page is also messy: a lot of bugs duplicates >> exist, many closed bugs are still indicated as open etc.. >> i can take care of that as i take care of bugs related to gtkdfb in >> debian: >

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Kalle Vahlman
2007/3/28, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > BTW, the directfb gnome bug page is also messy: a lot of bugs duplicates > exist, many closed bugs are still indicated as open etc.. > i can take care of that as i take care of bugs related to gtkdfb in > debian: Awesome! > do i need some speci

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:24 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: >> Murray Cumming ha scritto: >>> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout from svn, where sources are oft

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:24 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > Murray Cumming ha scritto: > > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > >> Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout > >> from svn, where sources are often updated with fixes not propa

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Murray Cumming ha scritto: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: >> Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout >> from svn, where sources are often updated with fixes not propagated in >> regular releases. > > How is that even possible? Do you

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Murray Cumming
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout > from svn, where sources are often updated with fixes not propagated in > regular releases. How is that even possible? Do you have an example? -- Murray Cummin

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
Michael Natterer ha scritto: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:09 +0530, Prasanna Kumar K wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I want to know which was the first and oldest version of GTK that was >> running over DirectFB without any bugs. > > Hi, > > there is no such thing as GTK+ or DirectFB without any bugs, >

Re: first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Michael Natterer
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:09 +0530, Prasanna Kumar K wrote: > Hi All, > > I want to know which was the first and oldest version of GTK that was > running over DirectFB without any bugs. Hi, there is no such thing as GTK+ or DirectFB without any bugs, you need to test old versions and choose one

first Gtk Version over DirectFB

2007-03-28 Thread Prasanna Kumar K
Hi All, I want to know which was the first and oldest version of GTK that was running over DirectFB without any bugs. I guess it was gtk+-2.8.17 or gtk+-2.9.4 I'm running all the big GTK appliacations (FireFox) with gtk+-2.10.1 over DirectFB successfully. Any idea about the oldest version.. Re