Matthias Clasen ha scritto:
> On 3/28/07, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> i believe it would be nice if someone could sync directfb backend in
>> trunk with stable release: all that's in trunk can be safely backported
>> into 2.10 (also some autofile sysnc is needed).
>> I sadly
On 3/28/07, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i believe it would be nice if someone could sync directfb backend in
> trunk with stable release: all that's in trunk can be safely backported
> into 2.10 (also some autofile sysnc is needed).
> I sadly cannot do it by myself as i have n
Kalle Vahlman ha scritto:
> 2007/3/28, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> BTW, the directfb gnome bug page is also messy: a lot of bugs duplicates
>> exist, many closed bugs are still indicated as open etc..
>> i can take care of that as i take care of bugs related to gtkdfb in
>> debian:
>
2007/3/28, Attilio Fiandrotti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> BTW, the directfb gnome bug page is also messy: a lot of bugs duplicates
> exist, many closed bugs are still indicated as open etc..
> i can take care of that as i take care of bugs related to gtkdfb in
> debian:
Awesome!
> do i need some speci
Emmanuele Bassi ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:24 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
>> Murray Cumming ha scritto:
>>> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout
from svn, where sources are oft
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 16:24 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Murray Cumming ha scritto:
> > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> >> Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout
> >> from svn, where sources are often updated with fixes not propa
Murray Cumming ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
>> Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout
>> from svn, where sources are often updated with fixes not propagated in
>> regular releases.
>
> How is that even possible? Do you
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:38 +0200, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
> Once again, i strongly suggest people interested in gtkdfb to checkout
> from svn, where sources are often updated with fixes not propagated in
> regular releases.
How is that even possible? Do you have an example?
--
Murray Cummin
Michael Natterer ha scritto:
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:09 +0530, Prasanna Kumar K wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I want to know which was the first and oldest version of GTK that was
>> running over DirectFB without any bugs.
>
> Hi,
>
> there is no such thing as GTK+ or DirectFB without any bugs,
>
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 14:09 +0530, Prasanna Kumar K wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I want to know which was the first and oldest version of GTK that was
> running over DirectFB without any bugs.
Hi,
there is no such thing as GTK+ or DirectFB without any bugs,
you need to test old versions and choose one
Hi All,
I want to know which was the first and oldest version of GTK that was
running over DirectFB without any bugs.
I guess it was gtk+-2.8.17 or gtk+-2.9.4
I'm running all the big GTK appliacations (FireFox) with gtk+-2.10.1 over
DirectFB successfully.
Any idea about the oldest version..
Re
11 matches
Mail list logo