On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:14:16AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
Well, I think the easiest thing is to explain at the top of each
version, like I did for 3. Though now that library can parallel
display the two I need to update it to say GTK+ 2 is at /gtk and GTK3
is at /gtk3.
Perhaps easiest
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Well, I think the easiest thing is to explain at the top of each
version, like I did for 3. Though now that library can parallel
display the two I need to update it to say GTK+ 2 is at /gtk and GTK3
is at /gtk3.
I
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Similarly it would make sense to have the GTK+ 2 docs mention GTK3.
This is a good idea, indeed.
How about these two patches for GTK3 and GTK2 respectively? Not
tested, building now.
From
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Similarly it would make sense to have the GTK+ 2 docs mention GTK3.
This is a good idea, indeed.
How about these two patches for GTK3
the migration doc mentioned in matthias' email announcement is 404'd
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
the migration doc mentioned in matthias' email announcement is 404'd
as is the common questions document.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
the migration doc mentioned in matthias' email announcement is 404'd
Should be there now, I think.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:05 -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
the migration doc mentioned in matthias' email announcement is 404'd
yes, library.gnome.org will take just a bit to pick it up from the
tarball.
ciao,
Emmanuele.
--
W: http://www.emmanuelebassi.name
B: http://blogs.gnome.org/ebassi
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Tadej Borovšak wrote:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk3/unstable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
Any reason not to have the URLs at .../gtk/3.0/... ?
AfC
Sydney
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:00 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Tadej Borovšak wrote:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk3/unstable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
Any reason not to have the URLs at .../gtk/3.0/... ?
It's there now. It takes library.gnome.org a little
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:47 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:00 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Tadej Borovšak wrote:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtk3/unstable/gtk-migrating-2-to-3.html
Any reason not to have the URLs at
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:47 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:00 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Tadej Borovšak wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 14:03 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:47 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:00 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Tadej Borovšak wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:05 AM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
I can see how this could lead some users to get to the wrong
place though. Even with navigation and layout that pushes
people towards the 3.0 stack, the URLs are so predictable
that it's not unreasonable to expect
14 matches
Mail list logo
