On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> Michael Natterer gimp.org> writes:
>
>> I think my actual point here is: There are so many usecases
>> and levels of complexity in peoples' workflows, and
>> in the applications that can be written in GTK+, we should
>> not disable useful th
Michael Natterer gimp.org> writes:
> I think my actual point here is: There are so many usecases
> and levels of complexity in peoples' workflows, and
> in the applications that can be written in GTK+, we should
> not disable useful things because they are either not in
> fashion any longer accor
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Juan Pablo Ugarte
> wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:22 +, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
>> > From what I see... all one should *need* to do is specify the
>> > accelerator keys
>> > desired to trigger a
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Juan Pablo Ugarte <
juanpablouga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:22 +, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> > From what I see... all one should *need* to do is specify the
> accelerator keys
> > desired to trigger a given GtkAction and add that action to
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:22 +, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> From what I see... all one should *need* to do is specify the accelerator keys
> desired to trigger a given GtkAction and add that action to an action group
> (either with GtkBuilder constructs or with
> gtk_action_group_add_action_with
On 13/09/12 14:20, Ryan Lortie wrote:
Is there a usecase for users who regularly switch keybindings as part of
their normal workflow, or is this a sort of "customise the app once,
then use it forever" type of situation?
If you sit down at someone else's computer it is useful to be able to
swit
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:20 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On 12-09-12 05:15 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> >> I object. Do you really want to disable shortcut editors in
> >> complex applications such as GIM
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> hi,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
>
> On 12-09-12 05:15 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>
>>> I object. Do you really want to disable shortcut editors in
>>> complex applications such as G
hi,
Thanks for the feedback.
On 12-09-12 05:15 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
I object. Do you really want to disable shortcut editors in
complex applications such as GIMP?
I echo Mitch's objections. Ardour users find it very convenient to do
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:15 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
>> > hi,
>> >
>> > I recently wrote a patch[1] to re-enable accel labels in GtkMenu
>> > generated from GMenuModel. They g
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Natterer wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> > hi,
> >
> > I recently wrote a patch[1] to re-enable accel labels in GtkMenu
> > generated from GMenuModel. They got lost in the shuffle during some
> > related recent changes.
>
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
> hi,
>
> I recently wrote a patch[1] to re-enable accel labels in GtkMenu
> generated from GMenuModel. They got lost in the shuffle during some
> related recent changes.
>
> Essentially, the new approach means that the accel='' attribute o
hi,
I recently wrote a patch[1] to re-enable accel labels in GtkMenu
generated from GMenuModel. They got lost in the shuffle during some
related recent changes.
Essentially, the new approach means that the accel='' attribute of each
menuitem directly determines what the accel label will be
13 matches
Mail list logo
