On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Damon Chaplin wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:59 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
2. When you need a tooltip with a little more fancy contents, like
adding an image, or you want the tooltip to have different contents
per GtkTreeView row or cell, you will have to
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
On 6/12/07, Kristian Rietveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:38:44AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
There's also a new GtkTooltip object. Could we have some more information
about how this should be used and if it replaces any
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote:
gint gtk_builder_enum_from_string(GType type,
const char *string);
Just curious, but why do you have gtk_builder_enum_from_string when
Hi,
Here I am trying to run a simple Gtk+ program, I am getting error as
follows:
Can you plz give me suggestion..
*8
linux:~ # gcc base.c -o base `pkg-config --cflags --libs gtk+-2.0`
linux:~ # ./base
(base:4262): Pango-WARNING **: No builtin
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 01:22 -0400, Jeevan wrote:
Hi,
Here I am trying to run a simple Gtk+ program, I am getting error as
follows:
Can you plz give me suggestion..
First, helps if you attach the test program when you are asking for
help.
Next, gtk-devel-list is not the right list for such
2007/6/15, Jeevan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Here I am trying to run a simple Gtk+ program, I am getting error as
follows:
Can you plz give me suggestion..
This list its mean to be used by the Gtk+ development, and not for app
development. The gtk general discussion list mihgt me more
Am Donnerstag, den 14.06.2007, 22:22 -0700 schrieb Jeevan:
Hi,
Here I am trying to run a simple Gtk+ program, I am getting error as
follows:
Can you plz give me suggestion..
This list is for development of Gtk+ itself, the list for developments
using Gtk+ is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Let's do something a little cleaner and more flexible;
typedef void (*GtkBuilderConnectFunc) (GtkBuilder *builder,
const gchar *handler_name,
Tim Janik wrote:
[..]
Would that be enough?
why? what is the type specification good for if it's not an object?
and, didn't an earlier variant of your code match object=button
to some button object from the builder file? so then, the straight
forward mapping of the GSignal API would be:
Tim Janik wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Samuel Cormier-Iijima wrote:
gint gtk_builder_enum_from_string(GType
type,
const char
*string);
Just curious, but why do you have
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 15:32 +0100, Damon Chaplin wrote:
I think its quite important here to not repeat one of the
the most obvious mistakes of glade/libglade, swapping the
signal based on the fact that an object was specified
is confusing - it also rules out the use case of specifying
a
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:55 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Damon Chaplin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:49 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Anyway, my point here is not wrt code that exists already in Gtk+,
I am of the opinion that GContainer iface is missing, and that
objects in general
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
Johan Dahlin wrote:
Havoc Pennington wrote:
[...]
A possible convenience API could be to have a global singleton builder
or a hash of per-file builders and then something like:
I reported this as;
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447969
--
Johan
Johan Dahlin wrote:
Morten Welinder wrote:
user_type and user_data which I proposed doesn't make too much sense,
it's
also difficult to support since you can't (AFAICT) use a GValue as
user data.
It would be marginally useful for providing constant user data like...
* Strings: oink
*
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:59 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
1. If everything you need is a tooltip displaying a simple text string,
with or without Pango markup, the only thing you have to do is
just setting the tooltip-markup property.
just a small add-on, fresh from the commit
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:25 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Damon Chaplin wrote:
On Tue, 2007-06-12 at 13:59 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
2. When you need a tooltip with a little more fancy contents, like
adding an image, or you want the tooltip to have different
On Thu, 2007-06-14 at 11:55 -0300, Johan Dahlin wrote:
Damon Chaplin wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 11:49 -0400, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
Anyway, my point here is not wrt code that exists already in Gtk+,
I am of the opinion that GContainer iface is missing, and that
objects in general
On Sat, 16 Jun 2007, Damon Chaplin wrote:
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:25 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
please read Kris' description again.
if you set ::tooltip-markup, ::has-tooltip is set automatically, and
you don't need to worry about it. this is *not* the case if you connect to
::query-tooltip
GTK+ 2.11.3 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.11/
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.11/
gtk+-2.11.3.tar.bz2 md5sum: 49c53959df501a48c2cba834d1993508
gtk+-2.11.3.tar.gzmd5sum: 84b6c30467cc089ef1dcffe1d1f51906
This is the fourth development release
On 6/14/07, Justin Stallard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've looked through the tutorial, faq, API doc, and even google and I
can't seem to find out if there's some way to unbind all the
keybindings associated with a particular widgit. Is there?
What I want to have is this:
A GtkEntry
Could anyone please explain this behaviour:
Imagine a simple window with 1 box and 2 buttons in it. If you press
the first button, the second is destroyed, and a newly created button
packed into the box. This *works* on linux and win32 (gtk+-2.10.13).
Now, let button 1 start a thread which does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Felix Kater wrote:
Could anyone please explain this behaviour:
Imagine a simple window with 1 box and 2 buttons in it. If you press
the first button, the second is destroyed, and a newly created button
packed into the box. This *works* on linux
Kevin DeKorte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- From my limited GTK experience I have found that g_idle_add always
seems to work better than using gtk_threads_enter/leave.
Yes, the reason why idle functions work in any case is most probably
because they are running in the same thread as where gtk was
I too am rather intrigued by this problem...
I found this:
http://research.operationaldynamics.com/blogs/andrew/software/gnome-desktop/gtk-thread-awareness.html
and I'm wondering: is your gtk_main() surrounded by gdk_threads_enter/leave.
I imagine this missing would break in linux too, but just
Felix Kater writes:
So, my conclusion: On the contrast to linux, unter win32 there is no way
to use gdk_threads_enter() to synchronize between different threads.
Are you sure that it's gdk_threads_enter itself that blocks? Then your
first problem might be that you don't call gdk_threads_enter
Ok, forget that.
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gdk/gdk-Threads.html 4th paragraph in
Description
Unfortunately the above holds with the X11 backend only. With the Win32
backend, GDK calls should not be attempted from multiple threads at all.
so If you want to do multithreading on win32,
On 6/15/07, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/07, Justin Stallard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've looked through the tutorial, faq, API doc, and even google and I
can't seem to find out if there's some way to unbind all the
keybindings associated with a particular
GTK+ 2.11.3 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.11/
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.11/
gtk+-2.11.3.tar.bz2 md5sum: 49c53959df501a48c2cba834d1993508
gtk+-2.11.3.tar.gzmd5sum: 84b6c30467cc089ef1dcffe1d1f51906
This is the fourth development release
28 matches
Mail list logo
