gobject thread safety

2005-07-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
Tim, congratulations to the new job. Does that mean you get paid now to review gobject patches ? That would be awesome :-) I'd like to make one last attempt to get some motion on the gobject thread safety bugs, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65041 http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.

Re: Fwd: [directfb-dev] Re: Gtk 2.7.0 supported - works

2005-07-07 Thread Maciej Katafiasz
Dnia 07-07-2005, czw o godzinie 10:56 -0400, Mike Emmel napisaƂ: > I can and will but I used to get errors here Korkut is getting compile errors. > If I don't implement the stub nothing "bad" happens till runtime. > There probably are many of these umimplemenetd functions and as of now I get > no

Re: Fwd: [directfb-dev] Re: Gtk 2.7.0 supported - works

2005-07-07 Thread Mike Emmel
On 7/7/05, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 07:27 -0400, Mike Emmel wrote: > > Okay I need C guru help on this one. This is agianst the 2.7.0 > > tarball. I'm not getting any compile time errors and I think I should > > I've tried compiling the file with gcc 3.3.3

Re: Fwd: [directfb-dev] Re: Gtk 2.7.0 supported - works

2005-07-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 07:27 -0400, Mike Emmel wrote: > Okay I need C guru help on this one. This is agianst the 2.7.0 > tarball. I'm not getting any compile time errors and I think I should > I've tried compiling the file with gcc 3.3.3 and gcc 3.4 the problem > is > > At the bottom of my gdkkeys-

Fwd: [directfb-dev] Re: Gtk 2.7.0 supported - works

2005-07-07 Thread Mike Emmel
Okay I need C guru help on this one. This is agianst the 2.7.0 tarball. I'm not getting any compile time errors and I think I should I've tried compiling the file with gcc 3.3.3 and gcc 3.4 the problem is At the bottom of my gdkkeys-directfb.c backend file I have #define __GDK_KEYS_X11_C__ #incl