On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:01:13PM +0200, Luis Menina wrote:
If you have a recent version of GTK+ (= 2.12), just go with GtkBuilder
instead of libglade: this is the way things should be done nowadays, if
you create a simple interface (GtkBuilder is still young).
You can design your
Hello.
I have this code (window with 2 tabs), if i'm try to run - displays only
window without tabs, where is error ?
gtk_init (argc, argv);
window = gtk_window_new (GTK_WINDOW_TOPLEVEL);
gtk_window_set_title (GTK_WINDOW (window), Services);
gtk_window_set_position
Hello,
Le 26/09/2008, Vasiliy Tolstov [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hello.
I have this code (window with 2 tabs), if i'm try to run - displays
only window without tabs, where is error ?
Isn't the gtk_container_add(GTK_CONTAINER(window), notebook); missing?
Damien.
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 11:26 +0200, Damien Caliste wrote:
Hello,
Le 26/09/2008, Vasiliy Tolstov [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hello.
I have this code (window with 2 tabs), if i'm try to run - displays
only window without tabs, where is error ?
Isn't the
Hi, i will really appreciate if anyone can help me!
I have just started to use gtk+ and glade with dev-cpp in windows, and i ve
been following the tutorial,
http://www.micahcarrick.com/12-24-2007/gtk-glade-tutorial-part-1.html#Introduction_to_Glade3..
Finally i have managed to compile and run the
Hi all,
I want to create a transparent draw area and using cairo to draw line
with the window background.
My backed is directfb and I don't know if it is supported. I want to
start with an example working on X.
Is there somenthing attribute or function to do this?
Regards Michael
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 02:31 -0400, Ruben Safir wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:01:13PM +0200, Luis Menina wrote:
If you have a recent version of GTK+ (= 2.12), just go with GtkBuilder
instead of libglade: this is the way things should be done nowadays, if
you create a simple interface
After updating to glib 2.18.1, gtk 2.14.3 and pango 1.22.0
I'm seeing some funny behavior from GtkFileChooserDialog,
which has started to emit a GLib-GObject-CRITICAL message
on destruction.
Simple test case, based on the example in the documentation
for GtkFileChooserDialog:
void
Any ideas on what's going on?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553135#c8 ?
--tml
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Really noone any ideo how to hide a window to tray when minimized but not when
moving to another desktop with gtk?
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 19:57:05 +0200
Rorschach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a trayicon (gtk-status-icon) in C for a linux-application. I
created an event-handler
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any ideas on what's going on?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553135#c8 ?
Thanks, got it.
--
Allin Cottrell
Department of Economics
Wake Forest University
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any ideas on what's going on?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553135#c8 ?
On closer inspection, I see that Michael Natterer's patch is
already in gtk 2.14.3, and does not solve the problem I mentioned,
namely
GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
Hi,
I have a memory leak problem which I can't seem to understand.
I have a GtkTreeview/ GtkTreeModelFilter/ GtkTreeStore setup.
I have traced it to a case where memory leaks when I call
gtk_tree_store_set multiple times.
Here is a snipnet of my code demonstrating the problem. Am I suppose
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Michael Natterer wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any ideas on what's going on?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553135#c8 ?
On closer inspection, I see that Michael
Am Thu, 25 Sep 2008 22:20:17 +0200
schrieb Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:07 -0400, Morten Welinder wrote:
If all you really want is to change the defaults for box packing,
then why isn't that all you are proposing? It would be a simple
1-line patch to
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 13:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The important part of the assert semantics are: if the assertion
fails, the program aborts.
If you are using assertions in a way that make it important where or
how the message is reported
In
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Mike Kestner wrote:
The types would essentially be
boilerplate, so it's not like they are going to be a maintenance issue.
If the motivation for removing the types is that, things aren't as
beautiful as they could be then that argument doesn't really outweigh
the pain of
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
On Thu, 25 Sep 2008, Mike Kestner wrote:
[snip]
- Change the packing defaults for gtk_box_pack_start_defaults and friends
unless old compat types are detected, i.e.:
void
gtk_box_pack_start_defaults (GtkBox *box, GtkWidget
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
- Change additional defaults as needed, e.g.:
gtk_box_init (GtkBox *self)
{
gboolean compat_type =
g_type_is_named (G_OBJECT_TYPE (box), GtkHBox) ||
g_type_is_named
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:57 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 11:44 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
- Change additional defaults as needed, e.g.:
gtk_box_init (GtkBox *self)
{
gboolean compat_type =
g_type_is_named
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Peter Clifton wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 12:57 +0200, Tim Janik wrote:
As i said above, there is no need at all for micro speed optimization
in these code paths. And using GTK_IS_HBOX() adds a type registration
dependency, which prevents things like moving
Tim Janik schrieb:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 13:06 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The important part of the assert semantics are: if the assertion
fails, the program aborts.
If you are using assertions in a way that make it important where or
how the
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any ideas on what's going on?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553135#c8 ?
On closer inspection, I see that Michael Natterer's patch is
already in gtk 2.14.3, and does not solve the problem I mentioned,
namely
GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any ideas on what's going on?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553135#c8 ?
On closer inspection, I see that Michael Natterer's patch is
already in gtk 2.14.3, and does not
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Michael Natterer wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any ideas on what's going on?
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=553135#c8 ?
On closer inspection, I see that Michael
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 17:24 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Michael Natterer wrote:
On Fri, 2008-09-26 at 14:29 -0400, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Any ideas on what's going on?
Even though the update to each line may be trivial, I would say that
if a deprecation touches a lot of lines in every app, it really has to
meet a high bar for worthwhile-ness, or we're just wasting a whole lot
of people's time.
Deprecation should not be about aesthetics, or second-guessing the
Havoc Pennington wrote:
...
(if one is compelled to hack on boxes, my suggestion is to leave
GtkBox alone but add a new nicer container like HippoCanvasBox, its
features include:
* have left/right/center/fill x/y alignment
* you only need 1 expand boolean, alignment replaces fill with
something
28 matches
Mail list logo
