On Thu Jun 23 23:16:58 2016 GMT+0200, philip.chime...@gmail.com wrote:
> I've tried to capture some of the discussion that we've had so far, on-list
> and off, in this FAQ [1]. I also added some points for further discussion,
> such as the longer cycle length you mentioned above.
>
> Regards,
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 9:29 AM Peter Weber
wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 17:07:46 +0100, Simon McVittie
> wrote:
> > Ideally, we'd choose the trade-off such that projects that want to stick
> > to a stable-branch version are happy with
Hello Miroslav,
I also noticed, after upgrading my app from older GTK 2.24.x to
2.24.30 (on OS X) that the tree item reordering
(gtk_tree_view_set_reorderable) stopped working correctly.
Can you tell what that old version exactly is?
I noticed that between the tarballs of 2.24.23 and 2.24.30
Hello!
Writing this on webmail-client. Please bear with me.
On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 12:12:46 -0700, Christian Hergert
wrote:
> Sorry for the long post, I tried to condense it, unsuccessfully.
> ...
Thanks! That is a valuable insight into the development and changes of
Gtk3.
On 23/06/16 11:22, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:19:19PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>> If there is a compelling advantage to splitting up libraries, of course,
>> by all means do so.
>
> I have an example: gspell:
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/gspell
To be clear, I'm
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:19:19PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> If there is a compelling advantage to splitting up libraries, of course,
> by all means do so.
I have an example: gspell:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/gspell
The non-GUI parts could be implemented in GIO, with an extension
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 08:47:02PM +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Link it against gtk-3.0-wayland instead of both the x11 and wayland
> versions, and try again? My nautilus links against 25 X libraries, both
> the old-school versions and the xcb async versions. And to wayland libs
> as well as
On Wed, Jun 22, 2016 at 05:19:19PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On 22/06/16 13:14, Sébastien Wilmet wrote:
> > Time for another Project Ridley?
>
> Maybe; or maybe the benefit of those 30 extra libraries outweighs their
> cost (CPUs are faster now than in the GNOME 2 days after all), but we
>
Hi,
it seems that comboboxes (and probably some other widgets) are broken
on touchscreens. Is there any way to make them work again or to
work around bug https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=333470?
(Ideally, the bug would be fixed, but since it wasn't fixed the past
10 years, I don't have