On Oct 10, 2011, at 8:11 AM, John Ralls wrote:
I've made a lot of progress on this in the last few weeks. The wiki pages are
transferred, the gtk-osx, gtk-mac-integration, gtk-mac-bundler projects are
in git.gnome and ftp.gnome, and Kris has gotten most of the patches reviewed
and I've
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Please have a look and comment either here or directly to me.
I'd like to merge this into gtk-web master by Thursday.
looks good to me. we should also get ardour onto the ported-app list somehow.
On Oct 11, 2011, at 3:18 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Please have a look and comment either here or directly to me.
I'd like to merge this into gtk-web master by Thursday.
looks good to me. we should also get ardour onto the
I've made a lot of progress on this in the last few weeks. The wiki pages are
transferred, the gtk-osx, gtk-mac-integration, gtk-mac-bundler projects are in
git.gnome and ftp.gnome, and Kris has gotten most of the patches reviewed and
I've pushed them.
Now to the web page. I've written a
Great stuff! Thanks a lot for the effort John, good job! :-)
2011/10/10 John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us
I've made a lot of progress on this in the last few weeks. The wiki pages
are transferred, the gtk-osx, gtk-mac-integration, gtk-mac-bundler projects
are in git.gnome and ftp.gnome, and Kris
On Sep 12, 2011, at 9:15 PM, John Ralls wrote:
I rebased a local branch off quartz-integration against master and carefully
went through all of the changes. There were indeed a couple that didn't have
bugs, so I created the bugs and attached the relevant patches. There were
some others
On Sep 7, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Now, on technical matters:
I looked quickly at git diff origin/master..origin/quartz-integration
and the diff is very simple:
* A bunch of changes to gdk-quartz and gtk*-quartz.c - I imagine that
these can be merged just as they
John Ralls wrote:
Not moduleset, modulesets. Three sets of 9 modulesets. Also 36
patches, some of which are obsolete and could be deleted (and a
bunch more that could become obsolete if they were approved for
committing to Gtk), a customized jhbuildrc and several examples for
further
On 8 September 2011 23:42, Olav Vitters o...@vitters.nl wrote:
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:38:02AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
And the fact that I'm here shows that I agree. Shawn was here (until
Olaf kicked him off this morning) for the same reason. I'm quite
Shawn kicked himself off.
If you
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Michal Suchanek wrote:
[something irritable]
My reaction to the recent exchanges concerning GTK on both OS
X and MS Windows is quite different. Despite some snappishness
the conversation seems very encouraging for the future of GTK
as a cross-platform toolkit. Thanks,
On 9 September 2011 14:58, Allin Cottrell cottr...@wfu.edu wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011, Michal Suchanek wrote:
[something irritable]
My reaction to the recent exchanges concerning GTK on both OS X and MS
Windows is quite different. Despite some snappishness the conversation seems
very
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:28:21PM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
The rest of Gtk-OSX isn't Gtk. It's a build system using jhbuild with
its own modulesets, a python script for making application bundles,
and a few other bits and pieces, including gtk-quartz-engine, a Cocoa
HIT theme engine which I
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 12:34:59PM -0400, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
Emmanuel
I understand you care about Jeff, and though I believe the initial
message could be worded differently, I have to say:
* pot calling the kettle black regarding tone on the mailing list
* you're now banned from
On Sep 8, 2011, at 4:55 AM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:28:21PM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
The rest of Gtk-OSX isn't Gtk. It's a build system using jhbuild with
its own modulesets,
The moduleset could just be in jhbuild?
Not moduleset, modulesets. Three sets of 9
On Sep 7, 2011, at 2:10 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote:
Le mardi 06 septembre 2011 à 16:34 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
I'm not going to respond to most of that.
I think you shouldn't take Emmanuele's tone so bad. ;-)
He's always very direct, but his point is right, and his suggestions are
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:38:02AM -0700, John Ralls wrote:
And the fact that I'm here shows that I agree. Shawn was here (until
Olaf kicked him off this morning) for the same reason. I'm quite
Shawn kicked himself off.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
hi Paul;
On 2011-09-06 at 18:18, Paul Davis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
otherwise you're just forking gtk, and using the resources of the gtk
project to give an aura of officiality to what is essentially your own
personal project.
I'd
Le mardi 06 septembre 2011 à 16:34 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
I'm not going to respond to most of that.
I think you shouldn't take Emmanuele's tone so bad. ;-)
He's always very direct, but his point is right, and his suggestions are
actually the acknowledgment that your work is worth being part
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr wrote:
Le mardi 06 septembre 2011 à 16:34 -0700, John Ralls a écrit :
It's not a fork of Gtk+ (yet, though on days like this one I get
really tempted). I actually revived the gtk-osx project on SF; the
previous version was
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 08:25 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Windows and Linux build issues and support are handled on gnome.org: the
Quartz backend of gtk is not in any regard special and it should not
need separate resources.
One thing we have been bad at is learning to accept that sometimes,
On 7 September 2011 15:26, Federico Mena Quintero feder...@gnome.org wrote:
As to what is in Bugzilla, is there a quick way to find all the Quartz
bugs to speed up their review? (Or are those patches already in the
quartz-integration branch? I didn't look at individual commits to see
if
Hey :),
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 09:26 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
* This bit:
--- a/gdk/x11/gdkdevicemanager-xi2.c
+++ b/gdk/x11/gdkdevicemanager-xi2.c
@@ -417,10 +417,6 @@ gdk_x11_device_manager_xi2_constructed (GObject *object)
for (i = 0; i ndevices; i++)
{
dev
2011/9/7 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org:
On 7 September 2011 15:26, Federico Mena Quintero feder...@gnome.org wrote:
As to what is in Bugzilla, is there a quick way to find all the Quartz
bugs to speed up their review? (Or are those patches already in the
quartz-integration branch? I
On 2011-09-07, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
That's the inverse of a recent commit of mine to master, not sure how it
slipped in the diff, maybe the branch is being compared to a more recent
master?
Perhaps `git diff origin/master...origin/quartz-integration' would work
better?
P.S. As someone who's
EmmanuelYour an ass (as in donkey)
But don't be offended by my tone, I only say this because I care about what
happens the the OS X version of GTK.
John has been working his tail off, all the while responding to dump developers
like me, while I can't get a tweet out of an elites
On 9/7/2011 6:34 PM, Shawn Bakhtiar wrote:
EmmanuelYour an ass (as in donkey)
Everyone just HAS to vent their spleen, don't they? I don't know John so
maybe I am off base here but I'm fairly certain he is capable of defending
himself quite well without that sort of useless comment.
On Sep 7, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 08:25 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Windows and Linux build issues and support are handled on gnome.org: the
Quartz backend of gtk is not in any regard special and it should not
need separate resources.
One
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
okay, I've tried to get ahold of the gtk-osx project for a while, now,
but since sf.net is just a joke and decided to reject my @gmail.com
emails, let's try here.
can we *please* stop this madness:
17:05 CIA-8 jralls
On Sep 6, 2011, at 11:12 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
okay, I've tried to get ahold of the gtk-osx project for a while, now,
but since sf.net is just a joke and decided to reject my @gmail.com
emails, let's try here.
can we *please* stop this madness:
17:05 CIA-8 jralls
On 2011-09-06 at 13:32, John Ralls wrote:
if there are patches for gtk-quartz, why are these inside at least three
branches instead of being committed to corresponding main line one? why
are these branch continuously being merged instead of being rebased, if
they are personal branches?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
otherwise you're just forking gtk, and using the resources of the gtk
project to give an aura of officiality to what is essentially your own
personal project.
I'd politely request that you stop using this tone in
On Sep 6, 2011, at 3:07 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On 2011-09-06 at 13:32, John Ralls wrote:
if there are patches for gtk-quartz, why are these inside at least three
branches instead of being committed to corresponding main line one? why
are these branch continuously being merged instead
32 matches
Mail list logo
