On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 10:33:58PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> But we could make some internal changes to that API to allow you to
> pass associated metadata, maybe, so you could do something like:
> - tell the thumbnail API to only consider this private thumbnailer you
> have, and no other
> -
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 14:45 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 02:06:01PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:06 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > > Also, it's not primarily about the location of the cache but the
> > > thumbnailer. To me, the real value in
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 02:06:01PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:06 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > Also, it's not primarily about the location of the cache but the
> > thumbnailer. To me, the real value in using the generic thumbnailers
> > is not having to worry about
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:06 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:46:30AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 15:42 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > > However, the edits are application-specific [2], so it is not
> > > reasonable to expect the generic
Hey,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:46:30AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 15:42 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > However, the edits are application-specific [2], so it is not
> > reasonable to expect the generic OS-wide thumbnailers to be able to
> > handle them.
>
> This is
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 15:42 +, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:46:51PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > On 22 January 2018 at 09:28, Philip Withnall > k> wrote:
> > > From the GLib side of things, my thoughts are that this
> > > shouldn???t live
> > >
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:46:51PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 09:28, Philip Withnall wrote:
> > From the GLib side of things, my thoughts are that this shouldn???t live
> > in GLib, since it deals with pixbufs. As long as it integrates with
> >
Hey,
As a heavy user of the thumbnailing APIs, I had promised Bastien to
comment on this thread, but I wanted to coherently compile my thoughts
before doing that.
Some releases ago, I switched GNOME Photos to a custom thumbnailing
infrastructure. I have tried to summarise it here:
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:22 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Bastien Nocera
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I wanted to start a discussion about replacing
> > >
Hey,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> I wanted to start a discussion about replacing GnomeDesktopThumbnail
>> with an API that would live in the GLib/GTK+ stack.
>
>>
>> To sum up,
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:46 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On 22 January 2018 at 09:28, Philip Withnall
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > Hey,
> > > >
> > > > I
On 22 January 2018 at 09:28, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> > Hey,
>> >
>> > I wanted to start a discussion about replacing
>> > GnomeDesktopThumbnail
>> >
Hey Philip,
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 09:28 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I wanted to start a discussion about replacing
> > > GnomeDesktopThumbnail
> > >
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I wanted to start a discussion about replacing
> > GnomeDesktopThumbnail
> > with an API that would live in the GLib/GTK+ stack.
>
>
From the GLib side of
14 matches
Mail list logo