Hey there,
Replying to myself with a short status update:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Kristian Rietveldk...@gtk.org wrote:
- Implement class private data, bug 521707 has been filed for this and
contains a patch. I will give this a review and if the patch seems
right get Tim to review it
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:58 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
I've started putting a list together here:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/StyleProperties although, the page should
probably be moved to a better location under GTK+ if someone could
suggest one.
maybe something like the page for the
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:00 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:58 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
I've started putting a list together here:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/StyleProperties although, the page should
probably be moved to a better location under GTK+ if someone
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:42 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
I'd like to know what thoughts people have on a migration plan for GTK+
that involves moving to a new widget drawing library during the 3.0
cycle.
Emmanuele has pointed out to me that 3.0 is still some way off (more
than 6 months). With
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Thomas Woodt...@gnome.org wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 10:00 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:58 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
I've started putting a list together here:
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/StyleProperties although, the page
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 14:26 +0100, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
Before redoing all the work might be worthwhile to look at
http://live.gnome.org/GnomeArt/Tutorials/GtkThemes/GtkButton and
similar pages.
Well, not really. The above page is a list of style-properties, where as
we were trying to
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 22:42 +0100, Thomas Wood wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:40 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
There's the issue of CSS though. Would it be acceptable to deprecate
gtkrc's in the middle of the 3.0 cycle in favor of CSS theming files?
This is an area where I'm pretty much
2009/8/19 Cody Russell brats...@gnome.org:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
One of the items I haven't seen discussed is input validation. Web
frameworks such as Rails and Django spent a great deal of time
making
these easy to work with and I think that it should
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Alberto Ruizar...@gnome.org wrote:
2009/8/14 Kristian Rietveld k...@gtk.org:
As for theming, I've been discussing a bit with Thomas, Carlos and
Cody. We have reached some sort of consensus that a backwards
compatible path is possible adding a second vtable for
Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2009/8/19 Cody Russellbrats...@gnome.org:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
One of the items I haven't seen discussed is input validation. Web
frameworks such as Rails and Django spent a great deal of time
making
these easy to work with and I
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:27 AM, Christian Hergertch...@dronelabs.com wrote:
One of the items I haven't seen discussed is input validation. Web
frameworks such as Rails and Django spent a great deal of time making these
easy to work with and I think that it should be considered for gtk+
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Alberto Ruizar...@gnome.org wrote:
2009/8/19 Cody Russell brats...@gnome.org:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
One of the items I haven't seen discussed is input validation. Web
frameworks such as Rails and Django spent a great deal
2009/8/19 Kristian Rietveld k...@gtk.org:
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Alberto Ruizar...@gnome.org wrote:
2009/8/19 Cody Russell brats...@gnome.org:
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
One of the items I haven't seen discussed is input validation. Web
frameworks
2009/8/19 Kristian Rietveld k...@gtk.org:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 1:40 PM, Alberto Ruizar...@gnome.org wrote:
2009/8/14 Kristian Rietveld k...@gtk.org:
As for theming, I've been discussing a bit with Thomas, Carlos and
Cody. We have reached some sort of consensus that a backwards
compatible
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:40 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
As for theming, I've been discussing a bit with Thomas, Carlos and
Cody. We have reached some sort of consensus that a backwards
compatible path is possible adding a second vtable for engines,
checking the vtable size and working out a
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 13:25 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
Great to know that progress is being made here. Trying things out
definitely sounds like a good idea. Even though we are now not
planning to deprecate GtkStyle in 3.0, we should have an idea whether
just sealing it will provide
Hello,
One of the items I haven't seen discussed is input validation. Web
frameworks such as Rails and Django spent a great deal of time making
these easy to work with and I think that it should be considered for
gtk+ 3.0.
FWIW, I hacked up a crude idea[1] a few months ago. If others
On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 15:27 -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
One of the items I haven't seen discussed is input validation. Web
frameworks such as Rails and Django spent a great deal of time
making
these easy to work with and I think that it should be considered for
gtk+ 3.0.
I only
2009/8/14 Kristian Rietveld k...@gtk.org:
Hi All,
A different way to start working on the new features is to decide on a
feature set first, research the features and (if required) make
required changes *before* an ABI frozen GTK+ 3.0 is put out. This
brings up the next question: what
19 matches
Mail list logo
