On Wednesday 07 September 2011, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> This happened because I had 4 xterm windows openend
I didn't mean to offend :-)
> Maybe the history rewriting features of git can re-linearize the
> commits.
Tool-wise, it is easy. The problem is: Once you pushed something out to
the pub
Quoting Hauke Lathus from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
:Please take a look at gtk-gnutella's graph with a graphical history
:browser such as gitk (which is part of Git's main distribution). You
:will notice what an (unnecessarily) complex graph you created in the
:first half of 2011-09-06, and
Hi Raphael,
On Tuesday 06 September 2011, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> This is going to create lots of entries because I do "git push" and
> "git pull" a lot between my sandboxes or with github. I don't need
> any commit message unless something was actually done.
>
> Is there a way to retro-active
Quoting Hauke Lathus from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
:As Jeroen pointed out, you can add a second remote target for the shared
:repo if you want to push to it. It is also possible to configure Git to
:use that as default. The more straight-forward way, IMHO, would be to
:edit the URL of the "
On Tuesday 06 September 2011, Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
> On 4 Sep 2011, h...@pansensack.de wrote:
>> Rebasing means automatically rewriting the latest part of your
>> commit history so that it is based on a different parent commit.
>> This is necessary to avoid conflicts when you pull from an
>> in
On 4 Sep 2011, h...@pansensack.de wrote:
> On Saturday 03 September 2011, Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
>> I have been grappling with git for some time. People keep saying
>> that it has different 'models', but I could never find any sort of
>> discussion of what these models are [a high level overview]
Hi Bill,
On Saturday 03 September 2011, Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
> I have been grappling with git for some time. People keep saying
> that it has different 'models', but I could never find any sort of
> discussion of what these models are [a high level overview].
What these people mean by "models"
On Saturday 03 September 2011, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> And is it possible then to have these cloned repositories sync
> directly from the public server, not from the local clone?
As Jeroen pointed out, you can add a second remote target for the shared
repo if you want to push to it. It is also
On 2 Sep 2011, raphael_manfr...@pobox.com wrote:
> How can I work with multiple sandboxes tied to the same GIT database?
I have been grappling with git for some time. People keep saying that
it has different 'models', but I could never find any sort of discussion
of what these models are [a hi
Op 3 sep 2011, om 08:59 heeft Raphael Manfredi het volgende geschreven:
> And is it possible then to have these cloned repositories sync directly
> from the public server, not from the local clone? I want some clones to
> push back to the local master clone (for integration purposes) and some
>
Quoting Hauke Lathus from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
:There are different answers to that question. The short one is probably
:this: Make the second (and third etc.) clone not from the shared
:repository over the network, but directly from your first clone through
:the local filesystem. Git w
Hi Raphael,
On Friday 02 September 2011, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> How can I work with multiple sandboxes tied to the same GIT database?
>
> I don't want to clone multiple copies of git everywhere here but I
> want to have several trees (between 5 and 10) with various distinct
> changed made to e
How can I work with multiple sandboxes tied to the same GIT database?
I don't want to clone multiple copies of git everywhere here but I want
to have several trees (between 5 and 10) with various distinct changed made
to each of them that I can test independently.
This is very convenient because
On 28 Aug 2011, jer...@asselman.com wrote:
> The current converted svn to git is available at
> https://github.com/gtk-gnutella/gtk-gnutella.
Most things seem identical except for the RCS/CVS hold over of using
keyword expansions like '$Id'. These seemed obsolete with SVN (yet
alone git) a
Hi Jeroen,
Hi list (this might be useful for those who are new to Git),
On Sunday 28 August 2011, Jeroen Asselman wrote:
> The current converted svn to git is available at
> https://github.com/gtk-gnutella/gtk-gnutella . Please do not fork
> but check if everything looks alright.
Perfect! I real
15 matches
Mail list logo
