Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 04:26 +0300 schrieb Владимир:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com
wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 17:36 +0300, Владимир wrote:
There is nothing server about change notification
Hi there,
On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 14:35 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
I think that we are now at a place where its used widely enough and
is important enough that we need to be able to rely on the basic
threading primitives in our libraries and plugins by default. It
would be nice to be able
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
wrote:
ardour uses a modified version (GtkCustomRuler along with its HV
derivatives) in ardour, because the stock ruler is not flexible
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
wrote:
the original author (we didn't write it, though we
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 07:16, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:55 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:28 AM, Paul Davis
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:28 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Could we -statically- link libgthread + libgmodule into libglib and
libgdk + libgdk-pixbuf into libgtk libraries respectively[4]
ugh. that would make Clutter depend on libgtk.
bad, very bad.
I'd rather have libgdk-pixbuf be
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 13:41 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:28 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
Could we -statically- link libgthread + libgmodule into libglib and
libgdk + libgdk-pixbuf into libgtk libraries respectively[4]
ugh. that would make Clutter depend on
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 13:47 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
I'd rather have libgdk-pixbuf be definitely split out from GTK+ (and
fixed with the API breaking fury of an angry god of old while we're at
it) instead - which would collide with the whole idea of having fewer
libraries but at least
Hi Dave,
The easiest way to use Pango / pango-view for a font website is to use custom
fontconfig config to make only the desired font available. Then you don't
even have to specify a font anymore!
This is actually easier than I had expected. Here it goes:
Create a directory, put your font in
On 3 June 2010 00:42, Behdad Esfahbod behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
Voila!
Wow, okay yes that's a nice hack to do what I want to do today.
But there seems to be an underlying issue with the way font familes
with unconventional family naming schemes are handled, and I hope this
can be
On 06/02/2010 07:55 PM, Dave Crossland wrote:
On 3 June 2010 00:42, Behdad Esfahbod behdad.esfah...@gmail.com wrote:
Voila!
Wow, okay yes that's a nice hack to do what I want to do today.
But there seems to be an underlying issue with the way font familes
with unconventional family
Hello all,
Actually, I have an icon constructed with an image and a label, each packed
inside two separate Eventbox.
I was writing code for capturing DnD signals on the eventboxes but it was
not working. I tried altering the GDK event mask to GDK_ALL_EVENTS_MASK but
in vain.
Then I set the
OK, I shouldn't have mentioned memory. Trying again.
Why was
void gtk_widget_get_allocation(GtkWidget *widget, GtkAllocation *allocation)
chosen, rather than
GtkAllocation *gtk_widget_get_allocation(GtkWidget *widget)
?
Cheers,
Patrick
___
Any idea?
2010/5/30 John Williams asb1...@gmail.com:
Don't work. Using gtk_button_new_from_stock I got no image in the
button, just the label my-icon. Using gtk_scale_button_new I got
Segmentation fault again.
Code:
iconFactory = gtk_icon_factory_new();
Hello gtk-list,
I'm using
g_mem_set_vtable(glib_mem_profiler_table);
g_atexit(g_mem_profile);
as the first calls in the main function.
Even the most simple test app leaks memory about 125 KB
with 90% freed.
Do i have to call some cleanup methods (gtk_exit is deprecated
and doesnt work well) ?
Hi.
There are two distinct stock things in GTK+: stock items[1] and stock
icons[2]. Connection between them is purely conventional by virtue of
using the same ID for both stock item and icon, but nothing is
preventing you from having only item or only icon. It's developer's
responsibility to
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:50 AM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Hello gtk-list,
I'm using
g_mem_set_vtable(glib_mem_profiler_table);
g_atexit(g_mem_profile);
don't even waste your time. gtk does not leak. you are not the first
(and will not be the last) to ask this question. determining
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:17 +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
OK, I shouldn't have mentioned memory. Trying again.
Why was
void gtk_widget_get_allocation(GtkWidget *widget, GtkAllocation *allocation)
chosen, rather than
GtkAllocation *gtk_widget_get_allocation(GtkWidget *widget)
?
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 13:50 +0200, Lothar Scholz wrote:
Hello gtk-list,
I'm using
g_mem_set_vtable(glib_mem_profiler_table);
g_atexit(g_mem_profile);
as the first calls in the main function.
Even the most simple test app leaks memory about 125 KB
with 90% freed.
leaks how? some
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 01:31:30PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 12:17 +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
OK, I shouldn't have mentioned memory. Trying again.
Why was
void gtk_widget_get_allocation(GtkWidget *widget, GtkAllocation
*allocation)
chosen, rather
Hi.
No it doesn't, which is why GtkAllocation is causing the problem with
GSEAL_ENABLE, viz:
GdkWindow *gtk_widget_get_window(GtkWidget *widget);
not
void gtk_widget_get_window(GtkWidget *widget, GdkWindow *window);
and not the other accessor functions.
You missed the most important
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:47:26PM +0200, Tadej Borov??ak wrote:
Hi.
No it doesn't, which is why GtkAllocation is causing the problem with
GSEAL_ENABLE, viz:
GdkWindow *gtk_widget_get_window(GtkWidget *widget);
not
void gtk_widget_get_window(GtkWidget *widget, GdkWindow
Hi.
OK - you did see my constructor example, no? It would be cleaner the other
way, wouldn't it?
I'm not a GTK+ developer and cannot speak for them, but having
consistent API is far more important to me than having some parts of
the code being brief.
Also, if you think about what this
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:01:18PM +0200, Tadej Borov??ak wrote:
Hi.
OK - you did see my constructor example, no? It would be cleaner the other
way, wouldn't it?
I'm not a GTK+ developer and cannot speak for them, but having
consistent API is far more important to me than having some
Hello.
#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION (2,18,0)
static GtkAllocation *dasher_get_widget_allocation(GtkWidget *w)
{
GtkAllocation a;
gtk_widget_get_allocation(w, a);
return a;
}
#endif
Just don't do this. Returning a pointer to a stack-allocated structure
is just screaming
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 03:23:21PM +0200, Tadej Borov??ak wrote:
Hello.
#if GTK_CHECK_VERSION (2,18,0)
static GtkAllocation *dasher_get_widget_allocation(GtkWidget *w)
{
GtkAllocation a;
gtk_widget_get_allocation(w, a);
return a;
}
#endif
Just don't
Hello Emmanuele,
EB leaks how? some internal objects are singletons, and won't be freed
EB for the entire duration of the application's lifetime.
A good libary/toolkit should always free singletons inside an exit
handler.
Just for the reason that using memory debugging tools is confusing
if it
Hello Paul,
PD enough. there have, on occasion, been small bugs found that cause
PD leakage under particular circumstances. but in my experience of this
PD mailing list (10 years now) just about every leak turns out to be a
PD misunderstanding about how memory is allocated, used and freed.
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:36 +0200, Lothar Scholz wrote:
Hello Emmanuele,
EB leaks how? some internal objects are singletons, and won't be freed
EB for the entire duration of the application's lifetime.
A good libary/toolkit should always free singletons inside an exit
handler.
that's
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:31 +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
Just don't do this. Returning a pointer to a stack-allocated structure
is just screaming SIGSEGV.
Which is why this isn't committed ;-) But finally you see the point?
yes. it sucks to maintain an application.
I can agree that
On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:39 +0200, Lothar Scholz wrote:
By the way, is there any way to find out what the reference count of
an object is?
you really don't want to know that - because threads and
auto-vivification during dispose cycles might change that value beneath
your seat.
if you want to
On Wed, 02 Jun 2010 14:41:39 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
you are, of course, free to start asking people to use atexit()
handlers to free up one-off allocations, starting from the bottom of
the stack (font-config, freetype, X11, glibc, Mesa, etc.) and moving
up towards gtk+.
No, please,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 02:45:56PM +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
because if you get a pointer to an internal data structure you're
allowing people to use it. using const would also not work because of
the (lax) semantics of const in C. it would, in essence, allow you to
poke around with
Hello.
By the way, is there any way to find out what the reference count of
an object is?
There is no need to know this. All you need to take care of is your
references on GObject. Most of the time this means calling
g_object_unref() when you don't need GObject that you created or
received it
--- On Wed, 6/2/10, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
From: Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
Subject: Re: Does GTK leak memory
To: Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de
Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org
Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 5:22 AM
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:50 AM,
Lothar Scholz
Hi.
This all seems odd to me because the widget contains the allocation already.
I don't give the address of a GtkWidget to some_widget_new() for it to
fill in the structure. I call some_widget_new() and it returns a pointer
to the widget which contains the allocation... All I need is a
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Sergei Steshenko sergst...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Wed, 6/2/10, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
don't even waste your time. gtk does not leak.
I have never laughed more. Just go through gtk+ release notes and look for
the fixed bugs related to
How would one go about testing their own application, with the fact that GTK
does not free some of its memory, in order to make sure the application isn't
leaking memory? I suppose that you could just look at a list of processes and
note when a repeated task (Opening/closing a window,
--- On Wed, 6/2/10, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
From: Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
Subject: Re: Does GTK leak memory
To: Sergei Steshenko sergst...@yahoo.com
Cc: Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de, gtk-list@gnome.org
Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 8:37 AM
On Wed, Jun
Hello Emmanuele,
EB personally, no: I don't think it's at all necessary. and I've been doing
EB memory profiling of glib- and non-glib based libraries and applications
EB for a while.
I'm programming C for 25 years and i still don't feel safe without
tools. And this is not really a feeling but
Hello Emmanuele,
Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 3:49:04 PM, you wrote:
EB On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 15:39 +0200, Lothar Scholz wrote:
By the way, is there any way to find out what the reference count of
an object is?
EB you really don't want to know that - because threads and
EB auto-vivification
On Jun 2, 2010 1:36pm, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Maybe GTK is really just another toy?
Interesting way to ask for help.
Best regards,
Indeed.
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Hello american,
Wednesday, June 2, 2010, 11:35:21 PM, you wrote:
On Jun 2, 2010 1:36pm, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Maybe GTK is really just another toy?
Interesting way to ask for help.
Best regards,
Indeed.
Well its the impression i get from GTK after spending
30
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
And a tool that just dumps me which objects are still alive would be
very helpfull too. MacOSX and MFC have features like this. Maybe GTK
is really just another toy?
and to think that i was trying to save you time and effort.
Anybody?
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Debmalya Sinha sunnywiz...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello all,
Actually, I have an icon constructed with an image and a label, each packed
inside two separate Eventbox.
I was writing code for capturing DnD signals on the eventboxes but it was
not working.
Hello Paul,
Thursday, June 3, 2010, 4:22:44 AM, you wrote:
PD On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
And a tool that just dumps me which objects are still alive would be
very helpfull too. MacOSX and MFC have features like this. Maybe GTK
is really just another
Greetings,
LS By the way, is there any way to find out what the reference count of
LS an object is?
LS Experimental printf statements to dump ref counter values are good to
LS understand which API function is adding a reference and which takes
LS ownership.
G_OBJECT(gtk_widget)-ref_count
47 matches
Mail list logo
