Hi all,
I'm trying to look up an icon's name from its stock ID.
For example, 'gtk-go-forward' should return 'gtk-go-forward-ltr' for me.
The reason is that I'm trying to make a GIcon from stock ID
'gtk-go-forward' to display to the user.
If it makes a difference, I am writing this using GNOME j
> Now what does that mean for you or me working with GNOME 3 (or GTK 3)? It
> means
> they can't rely on things staying the same or having a stable base to build
> on.
> Things keep changing. You can't just write something for 3.0 (be it an
> application, a shell plugin or a GTK theme) and expect
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 05:17:56PM +, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> The first conclusion from that is that it is (and has been for a few years) a
> bit disingenuous if people say "we're not using GNOME, we're just using GTK".
But that is exactly what I say – as a third-party program developer and
som
On Sun, Nov 11, 2012 at 6:36 PM, Jasper St. Pierre
wrote:
>
> I would disagree with you on backwards compatibility, slightly. I think we
> shouldn't try too hard, but we also now have a clear goal for theme authors:
> standard CSS. We should obey the goals of the standards, and follow their
> g
This is all well and good. It's certainly not where we (read: I) would like
to be, but it's a pretty accurate summary at this point.
I would disagree with you on backwards compatibility, slightly. I think we
shouldn't try too hard, but we also now have a clear goal for theme
authors: standard CSS.
Mike C. yahoo.com> writes:
> It is, but I'd talk more about GTK as a platform than GNOME here because I see
> a lot of caution to port to this mythical GTK3 beast. XFCE and LXDE seem to
> position themselves as wanting GTK3, but hesitant to grab it. SpaceFM only
> recently got GTK3 compatibility
