Am 26.03.2018 um 14:07 schrieb Lucky B.C:
In Unix-like operating system, If we disable the opening terminal which is
calling a program, we will close the program too.
That's bullshit. SIGHUP is not connected to the fact of a terminal
running. It is tight to the existence of a parent process
Am 26.03.2018 um 12:50 schrieb Wojciech Puchar:
how to link (or otherwise do other things) to disable opening terminal
when starting my gtk program under mac os x.
You need to put it in an .app-bundle. Any application packaged in a
proper bundle has a configuration file that allows you
h is
calling a program, we will close the program too.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:50 PM, Wojciech Puchar <w.puc...@digitalsystems.pl
> wrote:
> how to link (or otherwise do other things) to disable opening terminal
> when starting my gtk program under mac os x.
>
> on windows it'
e opening terminal when
> starting my gtk program under mac os x.
>
> on windows it's a link time option -mwindows (no console) or -mconsole (with
> console).
>
>
> thanks
>
> ___
> gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-app-dev
how to link (or otherwise do other things) to disable opening terminal
when starting my gtk program under mac os x.
on windows it's a link time option -mwindows (no console) or -mconsole
(with console).
thanks
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
Hello!
I'm trying to compile GTK+ on Mac OS X 10.7.4 with Xcode 4.3.2 (4E2002) with
gtk-osx-build-setup.sh and jhbuild.
I've successfully completed the bootstrap and meta-gtk-osx-bootstrap stages,
but have encountered a problem with meta-gtk-osx-core.
The first one is with the freetype library
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 21:08:47 -0700
Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
I've used it and it's as close to native as you can get without
actually using Cocoa and Objective C. I am sure Qt experts on the Qt
forums and mailing lists can answer your questions better than anyone
on this list.
On Nov 23, 2011 1:12 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Does wxWidgets do more in regard to the 'behaviour's mentioned above?
You'll want to ask the wx developers about that. They have their own
mailing lists and forums I'm sure.
I'd like to avoid pointer debugging and have statically compiled
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 11:49:47 -0700
Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll want to ask the wx developers about that. They have their own
mailing lists and forums I'm sure.
OK. I've asked...
Not sure what you mean about a statically compiled language.
My mistake...I wanted to say:
On Nov 23, 2011 12:30 PM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
How are you satisfied with the look of GTK+ on Windows?
Sometimes I hear there are not many devs working on Windows port.
Was good enough for my purposes. And quite a few of my non geek friends
use Gimp on Windows and I've heard no
On 11/21/2011 03:24 AM, Gour wrote:
Hmm...what would you say then about Qt on Mac?
I've used it and it's as close to native as you can get without actually
using Cocoa and Objective C. I am sure Qt experts on the Qt forums and
mailing lists can answer your questions better than anyone on this
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:40:32 +0100
Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
Because Paul knows what he is talking about.
:-)
GTK+ on the Mac is not perfect, but these days it's getting better
every week.
So, it means that soon/in_th_future GTK+ will become 1st class citizen
on Mac?
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 09:05 +0100, Gour wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:40:32 +0100
Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
Because Paul knows what he is talking about.
:-)
GTK+ on the Mac is not perfect, but these days it's getting better
every week.
So, it means that
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:18:24 +0100
Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
That's our intention. I have for example GIMP running on native
GTK+ and I don't see much remaining real bugs, only cosmetics.
Cool, cool. This makes me enthusiastic to embrace gtkD. ;)
Sincerely,
Gour
--
In this
Hello Michael,
Monday, November 21, 2011, 3:18:24 PM, you wrote:
MN On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 09:05 +0100, Gour wrote:
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:40:32 +0100
Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
Because Paul knows what he is talking about.
:-)
GTK+ on the Mac is not perfect, but these
Le 21/11/2011 10:34, Lothar Scholz a écrit :
A better example would be WingIDE for
Python which is GTK based - but programmers are geeks by definition.
They are converting their code to Qt :'(
--
Yann
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Come on and stop talking bullshit. You now exactly that this is not
true. A 1st class citizen toolkit has to use the Cocoa widgets and
this will never happen for GTK.
you have some very specific definition of 1st class
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:36:16 +0700
Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Hello Lothar,
This doesn't mean much for the App Stores, question is will you need
an easy end user distribution.
That's a good point. Yes, we'd like to provide easily installable apps
for Mac Windows users (probably
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:53:21 -0500
Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
I have no doubt that any App Store for OS X will become hugely
important. But that doesn't mean it will be only way people install
apps. Apple took some very smart steps to make installation extremely
easy because
Hello Paul,
PD On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Come on and stop talking bullshit. You now exactly that this is not
true. A 1st class citizen toolkit has to use the Cocoa widgets and
this will never happen for GTK.
PD you have some very specific
11:17
Para: gtk-list@gnome.org
Assunto: Re: GTK+ on Mac OS X status
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 07:53:21 -0500
Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
I have no doubt that any App Store for OS X will become hugely
important. But that doesn't mean it will be only way people install
apps. Apple
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
If they adapt the look and feel and functions of MacOSX GUI's they
are. The menu on top, native file selection, standard toolbar,
file icons, dialog modal sheets instead of application modal,
aqua look in dialogs... using
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:14:47AM +0700, Lothar Scholz wrote:
The only ways are
Take it elsewhere. And with that I mean, you've been removed from the
list. The topic is gtk, not wxWidgets or a counseling group for people
needing to express their issues.
--
Regards,
Olav (moderator)
Hello!
Some months ago I was considering to use D + QtD for writing
multi-platform desktop application being that if we want to target Mac
OS, then Qt looks better.
However, seeing that D's ecosystem was not quite mature, we explored
idea to use C(P)thon along with PyQt/PySide. (Since we have
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
So, how is the project of having 'native' GTK+ on going on and is it on
par with the Qt?
most people who work with GTK don't do much work with Qt and vice
versa, so its a bit hard to answer is it on par.
this application is
Hello Gour,
Sunday, November 20, 2011, 10:40:18 PM, you wrote:
G In the meantime we were busy with other (web) stuff and yesterday went
G checking what's the status of D's ecosystem with the intention to
G re-consider doing our project in D.
Is it really? I'm watching it for 5 years now at it
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 11:21:10 -0500
Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
most people who work with GTK don't do much work with Qt and vice
versa, so its a bit hard to answer is it on par.
OK. Not owning Mac, I also cannot discern how native are either Qt or
GTK+.
this application is
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:14:47 +0700
Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Hiya Lothar,
Is it really? I'm watching it for 5 years now at it is always in
terrible broken state. Definitely a no for me.
Well, I'm optimistic (by nature)... :-)
Forget it. Neither you nor any customer of you will get
On Sun, 2011-11-20 at 20:23 +0100, Gour wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:14:47 +0700
Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Hiya Lothar,
Is it really? I'm watching it for 5 years now at it is always in
terrible broken state. Definitely a no for me.
Well, I'm optimistic (by nature)... :-)
On Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:40:32 +0100 mitch wrote:
The tone of Lothar's mail borders outright FUD.
Lothar is one of those people who, for whatever reason, is incapable of
posting any comment not phrased as ${LIST_SUBJECT} is rubbish/run by
idiots/a waste of space. I expect it probably masks useful
Hi Paul
Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:11 AM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote:
As I understand it, using jhbuild will allow me to conveniently switch
between release tarballs and svn HEAD. It's also ensuring that
dependencies are built in correct order, so I'm pretty
John Pye wrote:
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of
GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that
something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff?
Depends on what you mean with
Does GTK on Windows currently build entirely with MinGW,
Yes it does.
It is much easier to cross-compile it from Linux than to set up a
working build environment on Windows natively, though. (Although, once
you have such an environment, it does work more or less as well as on
Unix.) So I would
Can you point me at a particular project on OBS?
The repository
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/windows:/mingw:/win32/openSUSE_10.3/
for 32-bit binaries, and
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/windows:/mingw:/win64/openSUSE_10.3/
for 64-bit ones. The Windows binaries are in
Hi Paul
Paul Davis wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:18 PM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote:
There's no PyGTK binary available anywhere for OS X. The only route seems to
be to use 'jhbuild' and John Ralls' instructions from gtk-osx.sf.net. This
seems unnecessarily difficult after the
Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of
GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that
something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff?
Depends on what you mean with buildbot. I guess buildbots are
usually used to
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:11 AM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote:
As I understand it, using jhbuild will allow me to conveniently switch
between release tarballs and svn HEAD. It's also ensuring that
dependencies are built in correct order, so I'm pretty happy to be using
that for the
2009/9/2 John Pye j...@curioussymbols.com:
Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of
GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that
something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff?
For other platforms (basically linux), you
Hi Tor
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of
GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that
something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff?
Depends on what you mean with buildbot. I guess
On 01.09.2009, at 06:53, John Pye wrote:
I believe there is some way to build a native OSX 'variant' of GTK
using MacPorts.
http://www.flyn.org/apple/
First paragraph worked for me, except for occasional unpredictable
bus errors. Also threading always crashes.
Should a developer include
Does the organisation have a plan to resolve the
outstanding bugs and features in gtk-quartz?
What the organisation?
--tml
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:18 PM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote:
There's no PyGTK binary available anywhere for OS X. The only route seems to
be to use 'jhbuild' and John Ralls' instructions from gtk-osx.sf.net. This
seems unnecessarily difficult after the pleasant experience of getting
Hi all
I recently did some work trying to port my program, ASCEND, for the Mac
OS X platform. It's a GPL program using PyGTK for its GUI. I'm a regular
Linux user, but I figured that adding OS X support could be useful for
expanding our user base, so I got hold of a Mac and I'm trying to make
John,
On the Mac most installs use either MacPorts www.macports.org or
Fink fink.sf.net to do the heavy lifting.
I think your question should be: Do Mac users need access to GTK+?
The answer is absolutely.
On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:18 PM, John Pye wrote:
Hi all
I recently did some work
Hi Marius
Marius Schamschula wrote:
John,
On the Mac most installs use either MacPorts www.macports.org
http://www.macports.org or Fink fink.sf.net to do the heavy lifting.
I have tried the Fink version of GTK but it's not available as a binary
(for some reason the distribution of binary
Hi,
just a very short thank you for the great work. Current svn snapshot
of Gtk+ for Mac OS X works for me, I have successfully compiled pidgin
(http://www.pidgin.im/) to run natively on Leopard.
Thanks, please keep up the good work!
Mario
BTW, in case someone wants to try:
I used 'plain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Martyn (+ GTK list),
I know you're probably not the one to ask this, but maybe someone at
Imendio knows, so I keep this short.
I program a lot using (Py)GTK, and the one thing worrying me most right
now is its support for Mac OS X. I don't get
Felix Rabe (public) skrev:
Hi Martyn (+ GTK list),
Hi,
I program a lot using (Py)GTK, and the one thing worrying me most right
now is its support for Mac OS X. I don't get much info about its status
from the developer.imendio.com pages. Do you have any hints on the
activities around it?
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 20:27 +0200, Richard Hult wrote:
It is moving along pretty nicely currently, there are a couple of bigger
issues that need sorting out (most notably popups with grabs), but it's
getting there.
Regarding pygtk, that should work pretty much like C apps, there is
Michael L Torrie wrote:
Although Leopard is just about to be released, I am still on Panther.
In the bug tracker there is a list of Tiger-specific calls that prevent
GTK from being compiled on Panther. That ticket was closed.
Yes, it was marked as a duplicate of another report that has a
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 21:34 +0200, Richard Hult wrote:
Michael L Torrie wrote:
Although Leopard is just about to be released, I am still on Panther.
In the bug tracker there is a list of Tiger-specific calls that prevent
GTK from being compiled on Panther. That ticket was closed.
Yes,
Richard Hult wrote:
Felix Rabe (public) skrev:
I program a lot using (Py)GTK, and the one thing worrying me most right
now is its support for Mac OS X. ...
It is moving along pretty nicely currently, there are a couple of bigger
issues that need sorting out (most notably popups with
I have a PowerBook G4 running Mac OS X 10.4.8.
I have installed Mac's development environment Xcode Tools.
What would I need to do to get GTK+2.0 built? Can I simply follow
the install for UNIX like systems and then I am good to go?
Jim
___
gtk-list
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 19:24 -0400, Jim Canning wrote:
I have a PowerBook G4 running Mac OS X 10.4.8.
I have installed Mac's development environment Xcode Tools.
What would I need to do to get GTK+2.0 built? Can I simply follow
the install for UNIX like systems and then I am good to go?
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 19:24 -0400, Jim Canning wrote:
I have a PowerBook G4 running Mac OS X 10.4.8.
I have installed Mac's development environment Xcode Tools.
What would I need to do to get GTK+2.0 built? Can I simply follow
the install for UNIX like systems and then I am good to go?
From: Michael Ekstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I usually just use Fink or MacPorts to get GTK+.
The name of the MacPort is gtk2.
John
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Hi, I newbie in GTK programming. I've built GTK on Mac OS X by script
from imendio, and looked for a demo programs. My question about GUI.
Is it possible to use native Mac OS X interface (Aqua). Or it's a
politic of GTK - don't use native OS's GUI and draw all elements by
itself.
Or it'll
Eugene Erokhin skrev:
Is it possible to use native Mac OS X interface (Aqua). Or it's a
politic of GTK - don't use native OS's GUI and draw all elements by
itself.
What's needed is a theme engine that uses the native OS X theme drawing
API, just like the windows port has a theme that does the
Eugene Erokhin wrote:
My question about GUI.
Is it possible to use native Mac OS X interface (Aqua). Or it's a
politic of GTK - don't use native OS's GUI and draw all elements by
itself.
It is by design. Gtk, like Qt is a complete toolkit and does all the
rendering of widget by themselves.
Hi,
I dont understand the code of this function : gdk_drawable_get_image
the back trace of gdb shows that :
#0 gdk_drawable_real_get_composite_drawable (drawable=0x482e558, x=0, y=0,
width=359, height=322, composite_x_offset=0xbfffe428,
composite_y_offset=0xbfffe42c) at gdkdraw.c:1189
#1
I dont know if I can cvs it, but this is my code for
_gdk_quartz_copy_to_image :
GdkImage *
_gdk_quartz_copy_to_image (GdkDrawable *drawable,
GdkImage*image,
gint src_x,
gint src_y,
Hi,
I tested GTK+ on Mac OS X (built with Imendio Build Page) and It seems that
the transparency is not working. Does anyone have this problem ?
In gdkdrawable-quartz.c, and in this function gdk_quartz_draw_image(...) I
see that there is a parameter that maybe has to be changed
Aaron Voisine skrev:
On 4/19/06, Aaron Voisine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a side note, I grabbed the latest glib/pango/gtk/cairo from cvs
(2006-4-18) and was able to get gimp to build without X11 being
installed (yay!). It displayed the splash screen (no fonts), loaded
the plugins, showed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all, I'm the guy who does the Gimp.app package. I was just
reading about the gtk on mac os x progress and the discussion about
the proper way to handle the menu bar. I'd just like to throw in on
the side of automating it to put the menu of the focused window
On 4/19/06, Aaron Voisine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a side note, I grabbed the latest glib/pango/gtk/cairo from cvs
(2006-4-18) and was able to get gimp to build without X11 being
installed (yay!). It displayed the splash screen (no fonts), loaded
the plugins, showed the window frame of the
On 2/11/06, Calvin Ellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question to the gtk developers is what would be the best approach as to
distributing software on the MAC platform that requires gtk?
I do this by creating a myapp.app directory in my home area, then
installing my program, gtk and
Hell all -I am working on a software program that uses gtk and operates on linux and windows. I am now working on the port to the MAC OS X tiger version. I'm following the instructions at the mac os x for gtk site (
http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/Gtk_Mac_OS_X/Build_Instructions ). While I'm
on the port to the MAC OS X tiger version. I'm following the instructions at the mac os x for gtk site (
http://developer.imendio.com/wiki/Gtk_Mac_OS_X/Build_Instructions ). While I'm having troubles getting it to compile on the MAC, I'm sure a little persistance will see it operating properly
I compiled it succesfully from second try (first time there was no
basic-atsui.c in Pango source, I tried to disable it but then gtk+
didn't work) and I can run tests but there are problems with fonts,
pixmaps, it seems like event boxes are bellow buttons (so you need to
click few pixels
...
-ak
Hubert Figuiere kirjoitti 26.11.2005 kello 6.06:
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Imendio AB announces the GTK+ on Mac OS X port project
Tue Nov 22 12:06:00 CET 2005
Since this is posted on the gtk-devel list, maybe it would be more
appropriate to have technical facts instead of P.R. B.S
On Nov 26, 2005, at 6:48 PM, Asko Kauppi wrote:
Also, this devlist is referred to by Imendio, which actually
brought me here... :)
On the other hand I think, it's a Good Thing to have the OS X port
as a normal part of GTK+ development. On the other hand, your
comment was so far the
Mikael Hallendal wrote:
Imendio AB announces the GTK+ on Mac OS X port project
Tue Nov 22 12:06:00 CET 2005
Since this is posted on the gtk-devel list, maybe it would be more
appropriate to have technical facts instead of P.R. B.S., no?
Hub
___
gtk
Imendio AB announces the GTK+ on Mac OS X port project
Tue Nov 22 12:06:00 CET 2005
The GIMP toolkit (GTK+) matures to include yet another platform. This
project aims to bring native GTK+ support to the Apple Mac OS X
platform. The basic implementation is sponsored by Imendio AB and the
work so
John M. Gabriele wrote:
Hi John,
I've heard about the new GTK+ port to OS X and was
hoping to find out more.
This was news around the beginning of October:
http://micke.hallendal.net/archives/2005/10/gtk-macosx.html
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=12153
but I haven't heard
I've heard about the new GTK+ port to OS X and was
hoping to find out more.
This was news around the beginning of October:
http://micke.hallendal.net/archives/2005/10/gtk-macosx.html
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=12153
but I haven't heard anything since.
Just curious:
1. Is this
I'm trying to get up and running with GTK+ development on Mac OS X
(n.b., using the real X11 APIs, not the GTK+OSX port which is layered
on top of Mac widgets).
First question: does anyone know of a build of the GTK+ libraries for
OS X that I can just download and use? The GTK+ web site says
Hi, have you looked at fink?
http://fink.sourceforge.net/
it'll automatically configure, build and install the whole shebang for you.
Even if you don't like fink, you can use it to get suggested configure
lines, libtool patches etc.
It looks like your build is failing because of the apple
77 matches
Mail list logo
