GTK+ TreeView: Different CellRenderers on the same Column

2011-10-17 Thread Stefan Salewski
I am working on a configuration file editor for an graphical application. Configuration consists of strings, numbers and boolean values. About 25 values total. I can use individual widgets for each property, but for larger quantities a listview is a more compact form. It would we nice to have

Re: GTK+ TreeView: Different CellRenderers on the same Column

2011-10-17 Thread Colomban Wendling
Le 17/10/2011 13:53, Stefan Salewski a écrit : I am working on a configuration file editor for an graphical application. Configuration consists of strings, numbers and boolean values. About 25 values total. I can use individual widgets for each property, but for larger quantities a listview

Re: Keybindings

2011-10-17 Thread Neil Munro
On 17 October 2011 15:54, Dong Luo us...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I did not use gtk recently. But I figure you can just let the toplevel widget response to the signal of key-press-event and do what ever Keybindings you want there. Dong Could you show me an example as I have figured out the

Re: GTK+ TreeView: Different CellRenderers on the same Column

2011-10-17 Thread Stefan Salewski
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 15:11 +0200, Colomban Wendling wrote: [...] The other solution I know is to pack all CellRenderer that might be used for editing, and only make one visible/sensitive, depending on the row's value type. This is what we current use in the implementation of Geany's stash

Change in GtkTextView sizing behaviour between and Gtk 2.24.6

2011-10-17 Thread Peter Clifton
Hi guys, I've got a bug filed against gEDA/gschem, which I can reproduce here on Ubuntu Oneiric, in that it seems the GTK text view widget we use for property editing is rendered at zero height with GTK 2.24.6. Looking at our code, it appears we don't request a minimum height (presumably a bug

Re: Change in GtkTextView sizing behaviour between and Gtk 2.24.6

2011-10-17 Thread Peter Clifton
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 16:53 +0100, Peter Clifton wrote: Hi guys, I've got a bug filed against gEDA/gschem, which I can reproduce here on Ubuntu Oneiric, in that it seems the GTK text view widget we use for property editing is rendered at zero height with GTK 2.24.6. Looking at our code, it

Re: Is GTK+ 3.x 2x slower than GTK+ 2.x?

2011-10-17 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, I was shocked by the bad performance of the tree list view from the beginning, so much that i'm now back to FOX toolkit. Yes, the tree list few is probably one of the worst performing pieces of code in GTK+. When resizing Eclipse's main window with all its complex UI and editors , the

Re: Is GTK+ 3.x 2x slower than GTK+ 2.x?

2011-10-17 Thread jcupitt
On 17 October 2011 10:23, Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com wrote: I was shocked by the bad performance of the tree list view from the beginning, so much that i'm now back to FOX toolkit. Yes, the tree list few is probably one of the worst performing pieces of code in GTK+. I wonder if

Re: Is GTK+ 3.x 2x slower than GTK+ 2.x?

2011-10-17 Thread Clemens Eisserer
Hi, Rhythmbox, for example, displays many thousands of lines of information in a treeview and dragging the divider to make the widget resize is fast and smooth. Resizing the whole window is slower since that has to do a lot of WM magic. But the widget alone certainly seems quick on my modest

Re: gobject-introspection and MinGW

2011-10-17 Thread Earnie
Earnie wrote: Earnie wrote: Earnie wrote: I'm building gobject-introspection-1.30.0 with MSYS and MinGW. I'm to the point of the GISCAN GLib-2.0.gir and it reports No mscvr71.dll loaded. I'm using the python.org provided Windows distribution version 2.7. I had to modify the hack in

Re: Is GTK+ 3.x 2x slower than GTK+ 2.x?

2011-10-17 Thread Oscar Lazzarino
On 10/17/2011 11:51 AM, jcup...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 October 2011 10:23, Clemens Eissererlinuxhi...@gmail.com wrote: I was shocked by the bad performance of the tree list view from the beginning, so much that i'm now back to FOX toolkit. Yes, the tree list few is probably one of the worst

Re: Is GTK+ 3.x 2x slower than GTK+ 2.x?

2011-10-17 Thread David Nečas
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 06:12:37PM +0200, Oscar Lazzarino wrote: On 10/17/2011 11:51 AM, jcup...@gmail.com wrote: On 17 October 2011 10:23, Clemens Eissererlinuxhi...@gmail.com wrote: I was shocked by the bad performance of the tree list view from the beginning, so much that i'm now back to

Re: gobject-introspection and MinGW

2011-10-17 Thread Dieter Verfaillie
On 15/10/2011 18:49, Earnie wrote: I'm building gobject-introspection-1.30.0 with MSYS and MinGW. I'm to the point of the GISCAN GLib-2.0.gir and it reports No mscvr71.dll loaded. I'm using the python.org provided Windows distribution version 2.7. I had to modify the hack in

Re: Building gtk+

2011-10-17 Thread Dieter Verfaillie
On 15/10/2011 18:52, Earnie wrote: Earnie wrote: I've finally gotten all of the relevant libraries created and get to building gtk+ when I get the following error. How to overcome it? Creating library file: .libs/libgdk-3.dll.a make[4]: *** No rule to make target `Gdk-3.0.typelib', needed by

RE: generic refcounted object perl binding

2011-10-17 Thread YangXi
Beside those C++-specific things, I still have many question about gobject wrapper. Why the SV wrapper for a GObject keeps alive until both are freed? Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 11:04:50 +0200 From: kaffeeti...@gmx.de To: gtk-perl-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: generic refcounted object perl