GTK+ with Broadway.

2017-03-30 Thread Igor D
Hi,

I'm trying to change the cursor when it is over certain widget and do not
succeed to do that
when I'm working with GTK+ via Broadway. Without Broadway it works
perfectly.
Somebody knows about limitation for this case ?

Thanks,
Igor
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-12-05 Thread Daniel Kasak
Yes it is. Do something like:

ssh -C -L 1:127.0.0.1:1 me@remote_broadway_server

I also posted recently on a way to get multiplexed connections and
SSL/TLS termination:
https://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/

I'm trying to make some time to implement a complete solution, with an
authentication+cookie database and configurable redirection ( ie to
multiple broadway applications ), but free time is hard to come by.

Dan

On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is it possible to forward connection from web browser to Broadway display
> server via SSH ?
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, no there is no way to do this. *If* copy + paste were
>> implemented between a broadway app and the browser, then you could at
>> least push a link to a file to download into the browser, and the user
>> could copy it and paste it into a new tab. Anyway, copy + paste is not
>> implemented yet ( Hi devs ... if this is easy, it would be pretty
>> damned handy ).
>>
>> I haven't had to do anything like this yet, but if I had to tomorrow,
>> I'd get users to enter an email address in a config screen, and I'd
>> email documents or links to downloads to them. Not ideal, I know.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I'm working with GTK+ via Broadway.
>> > I need to upload and save some file on local computer (which run
>> > browser).
>> > Can I do in this mode that and how ?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Igor
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Dan,
>> >>
>> >> I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work
>> >> only after triggers from user.
>> >>
>> >> I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck.
>> >>
>> >> Your inputs are optimistic :-)
>> >>
>> >> Thanks a lot for the help.
>> >> Igor
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> > Hi,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks for prompt reply.
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
>> >>> > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect
>> >>> > something
>> >>> > reasonable. My few experiments show
>> >>> > that performance may be too low.
>> >>>
>> >>> I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I
>> >>> have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very
>> >>> rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the
>> >>> number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start
>> >>> to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly
>> >>> would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to
>> >>> deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real"
>> >>> web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are
>> >>> you considering distributing?
>> >>>
>> >>> It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time
>> >>> graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text
>> >>> flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app
>> >>> that sits still and waits for a user to do something.
>> >>>
>> >>> I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than
>> >>> VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty
>> >>> impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly.
>> >>>
>> >>> > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found
>> >>> > few
>> >>> > minor
>> >>> > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.
>> >>>
>> >>> I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may hav

Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-12-05 Thread Igor D
Hi,

Is it possible to forward connection from web browser to Broadway display
server via SSH ?

Thanks,
Igor

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 12:15 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Unfortunately, no there is no way to do this. *If* copy + paste were
> implemented between a broadway app and the browser, then you could at
> least push a link to a file to download into the browser, and the user
> could copy it and paste it into a new tab. Anyway, copy + paste is not
> implemented yet ( Hi devs ... if this is easy, it would be pretty
> damned handy ).
>
> I haven't had to do anything like this yet, but if I had to tomorrow,
> I'd get users to enter an email address in a config screen, and I'd
> email documents or links to downloads to them. Not ideal, I know.
>
> Dan
>
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm working with GTK+ via Broadway.
> > I need to upload and save some file on local computer (which run
> browser).
> > Can I do in this mode that and how ?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Dan,
> >>
> >> I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work
> >> only after triggers from user.
> >>
> >> I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck.
> >>
> >> Your inputs are optimistic :-)
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot for the help.
> >> Igor
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Hi,
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks for prompt reply.
> >>> >
> >>> > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
> >>> > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect
> >>> > something
> >>> > reasonable. My few experiments show
> >>> > that performance may be too low.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I
> >>> have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very
> >>> rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the
> >>> number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start
> >>> to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly
> >>> would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to
> >>> deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real"
> >>> web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are
> >>> you considering distributing?
> >>>
> >>> It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time
> >>> graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text
> >>> flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app
> >>> that sits still and waits for a user to do something.
> >>>
> >>> I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than
> >>> VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty
> >>> impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly.
> >>>
> >>> > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found
> few
> >>> > minor
> >>> > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.
> >>>
> >>> I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set
> >>> some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and
> >>> icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't
> >>> work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have
> >>> you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth
> >>> documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11.
> >>>
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks,
> >>> > Igor
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <
> d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> >>> > wrote:
> >>> >>
> >>> >> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
> >>> >> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. 

Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-11-29 Thread Daniel Kasak
Unfortunately, no there is no way to do this. *If* copy + paste were
implemented between a broadway app and the browser, then you could at
least push a link to a file to download into the browser, and the user
could copy it and paste it into a new tab. Anyway, copy + paste is not
implemented yet ( Hi devs ... if this is easy, it would be pretty
damned handy ).

I haven't had to do anything like this yet, but if I had to tomorrow,
I'd get users to enter an email address in a config screen, and I'd
email documents or links to downloads to them. Not ideal, I know.

Dan

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with GTK+ via Broadway.
> I need to upload and save some file on local computer (which run browser).
> Can I do in this mode that and how ?
>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work
>> only after triggers from user.
>>
>> I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck.
>>
>> Your inputs are optimistic :-)
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the help.
>> Igor
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Thanks for prompt reply.
>>> >
>>> > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
>>> > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect
>>> > something
>>> > reasonable. My few experiments show
>>> > that performance may be too low.
>>>
>>> I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I
>>> have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very
>>> rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the
>>> number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start
>>> to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly
>>> would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to
>>> deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real"
>>> web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are
>>> you considering distributing?
>>>
>>> It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time
>>> graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text
>>> flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app
>>> that sits still and waits for a user to do something.
>>>
>>> I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than
>>> VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty
>>> impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly.
>>>
>>> > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found few
>>> > minor
>>> > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.
>>>
>>> I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set
>>> some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and
>>> icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't
>>> work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have
>>> you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth
>>> documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11.
>>>
>>> Dan
>>>
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> > Igor
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
>>> >> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is
>>> >> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1
>>> >> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this
>>> >> topic a little while back:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/
>>> >>
>>> >> Are you after some info in particular?
>>> >>
>>> >> Dan
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> > Hi,
>>> >> >
>>> >> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with
>>> >> > Broadway.
>>> >> > I'll be glad to have feedback.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Thanks
>>> >> > Igor
>>> >> >
>>> >> > ___
>>> >> > gtk-list mailing list
>>> >> > gtk-list@gnome.org
>>> >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>>> >> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> ___
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-11-29 Thread Igor D
Hi,

I'm working with GTK+ via Broadway.
I need to upload and save some file on local computer (which run browser).
Can I do in this mode that and how ?

Thanks,
Igor

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Dan,
>
> I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work
> only after triggers from user.
>
> I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck.
>
> Your inputs are optimistic :-)
>
> Thanks a lot for the help.
> Igor
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Thanks for prompt reply.
>> >
>> > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
>> > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect
>> something
>> > reasonable. My few experiments show
>> > that performance may be too low.
>>
>> I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I
>> have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very
>> rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the
>> number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start
>> to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly
>> would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to
>> deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real"
>> web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are
>> you considering distributing?
>>
>> It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time
>> graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text
>> flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app
>> that sits still and waits for a user to do something.
>>
>> I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than
>> VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty
>> impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly.
>>
>> > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found few
>> minor
>> > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.
>>
>> I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set
>> some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and
>> icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't
>> work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have
>> you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth
>> documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Igor
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
>> >> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is
>> >> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1
>> >> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this
>> >> topic a little while back:
>> >>
>> >> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-
>> gtk3-html5-backend/
>> >>
>> >> Are you after some info in particular?
>> >>
>> >> Dan
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with
>> Broadway.
>> >> > I'll be glad to have feedback.
>> >> >
>> >> > Thanks
>> >> > Igor
>> >> >
>> >> > ___
>> >> > gtk-list mailing list
>> >> > gtk-list@gnome.org
>> >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>> >> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-10-13 Thread Igor D
Hi Dan,

I don't need real time graphing or something like that. It should work only
after triggers from user.

I don't remember exactly which feature was missed. I'll recheck.

Your inputs are optimistic :-)

Thanks a lot for the help.
Igor



On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks for prompt reply.
> >
> > Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
> > 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect
> something
> > reasonable. My few experiments show
> > that performance may be too low.
>
> I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I
> have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very
> rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the
> number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start
> to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly
> would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to
> deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real"
> web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are
> you considering distributing?
>
> It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time
> graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text
> flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app
> that sits still and waits for a user to do something.
>
> I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than
> VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty
> impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly.
>
> > 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found few
> minor
> > differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.
>
> I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set
> some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and
> icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't
> work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have
> you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth
> documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11.
>
> Dan
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Igor
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
> >> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is
> >> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1
> >> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this
> >> topic a little while back:
> >>
> >> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-
> broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/
> >>
> >> Are you after some info in particular?
> >>
> >> Dan
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi,
> >> >
> >> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with Broadway.
> >> > I'll be glad to have feedback.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks
> >> > Igor
> >> >
> >> > ___
> >> > gtk-list mailing list
> >> > gtk-list@gnome.org
> >> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
> >> >
> >
> >
>
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-10-13 Thread Daniel Kasak
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Thanks for prompt reply.
>
> Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
> 1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect something
> reasonable. My few experiments show
> that performance may be too low.

I haven't seen bad performance in terms of user experience, though I
have noticed high CPU usage in the broadwayd process(es). My very
rough guess is that you can support somewhere between 2-3 times the
number of active users as CPU cores on your system before users start
to notice. I've never done any stress-testing to see what exactly
would happened if you pushed this limit. I guess if you're trying to
deliver to more users than this model supports, you're entering "real"
web-app development. Out of interest, what kind of applications are
you considering distributing?

It will depend a lot on what your app is doing I guess. Real-time
graphing or apps where there is constant rendering happening ( eg text
flying past in a log viewer ) will consume a lot more CPU than an app
that sits still and waits for a user to do something.

I've also noticed that broadway gives a much better experience than
VNC. VNC is laggy and has rendering glitches. Broadway is pretty
impressive under conditions where VNC degrades badly.

> 2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found few minor
> differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.

I haven't noticed any reduced features at all. You may have to set
some environment variables to activate things like gtk+ themes and
icon packs, but I haven't found anything with broadway that doesn't
work as I expect from a regular X11 experience. What differences have
you seen? If it's just things like icon packs, it might be worth
documenting what's needed to get on-par with X11.

Dan

>
> Thanks,
> Igor
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
>> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is
>> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1
>> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this
>> topic a little while back:
>>
>> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/
>>
>> Are you after some info in particular?
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with Broadway.
>> > I'll be glad to have feedback.
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > Igor
>> >
>> > ___
>> > gtk-list mailing list
>> > gtk-list@gnome.org
>> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>> >
>
>
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-10-13 Thread Igor D
Hi,

Thanks for prompt reply.

Yes, I have couple of specific concerns:
1. Performance. I'm not looking for something special but expect something
reasonable. My few experiments show
that performance may be too low.
2. Reduced feature set, comparing to GTK without broadway. I found few
minor differences but this makes me afraid that it might be more.

Thanks,
Igor

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Daniel Kasak <d.j.kasak...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
> toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is
> not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1
> password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this
> topic a little while back:
> http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-
> broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/
>
> Are you after some info in particular?
>
> Dan
>
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with Broadway.
> > I'll be glad to have feedback.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Igor
> >
> > ___
> > gtk-list mailing list
> > gtk-list@gnome.org
> > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
> >
>
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


Re: GTK+ with Broadway

2016-10-12 Thread Daniel Kasak
I've been using it on+off for a couple of years. As far as widget
toolkit functionality goes, it's a stable platform for me. Security is
not handled by broadway, except for basic password authentication ( 1
password per linux user who runs broadway apps ). I posted on this
topic a little while back:
http://tesla.duckdns.org/transparent-proxy-for-broadway-gtk3-html5-backend/

Are you after some info in particular?

Dan

On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Igor D <ivb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with Broadway.
> I'll be glad to have feedback.
>
> Thanks
> Igor
>
> ___
> gtk-list mailing list
> gtk-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
>
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


GTK+ with Broadway

2016-10-12 Thread Igor D
Hi,

I wonder if someone have practical experience with GTK+ with Broadway.
I'll be glad to have feedback.

Thanks
Igor
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list


Using GTK+ with Broadway

2016-08-09 Thread Igor D
Hi all,

I consider to use GTK+ with Broadway for development of device control
application.
Device is with functionality similar to  broadband modem/router (I
intentionally selected example which is familiar for all :-)  ).
Device should be controlled remotely via web browser.

My concern is about performance of such control. I'm afraid that Broadway
may be a bottleneck.
Probably I'm wrong but even in simple pilot I built it looks not so good.

It will be very appreciated to have your inputs based on real experience.

Thanks a lot,
Igor
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list