On Apr 4, 2013, at 10:06 AM, Steffen Gutmann wrote:
>
> Qt gets pretty close. I wish gtk-osx would also become more Mac friendly.
> Otherwise, why spending so muchh effort on it? If improved Mac experience is
> not _the_ goal of gtk-osx than we could as well just use the X11 version of
> g
Hi!
2) Clicking/tapping on top-level Mac menu items shows considerable
> (sometimes indefinite) latency. E.g. if I click on "Minimize" in the
> Window menu in a native cocoa app it minimizes with barely noticeable delay,
> but
> if I do the same in a gtk-quartz app nothing happens -- or not
On Mar 30, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Allin Cottrell wrote:
> First, thanks very much for all the work on gtk-quartz. It's looking good
> these days.
>
> That said, I'm seeing some problems with the top-level Mac menu in a
> gtk-quartz app. Here are two such:
>
> 1) Mac people tell me that ctrl+f2 (o
First, thanks very much for all the work on gtk-quartz. It's looking
good these days.
That said, I'm seeing some problems with the top-level Mac menu in a
gtk-quartz app. Here are two such:
1) Mac people tell me that ctrl+f2 (or fn+ctrl+f2 on a Macbook where
ctrl+f2 is taken for LCD brightne
