Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] remove gtk2hs.spec

2010-05-22 Thread Andy Stewart
Jens Petersen writes: > On 5 May 2010 20:08, Jens Petersen wrote: >> I think the rpm spec is long overdue... and > > Here is a new patch to drop the old unmaintained gtk2hs.spec.in. Apply, thanks! -- Andy > > Jens > > --

Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] remove gtk2hs.spec

2010-05-22 Thread Jens Petersen
On 5 May 2010 20:08, Jens Petersen wrote: > I think the rpm spec is long overdue... and Here is a new patch to drop the old unmaintained gtk2hs.spec.in. Jens remove-old-gtk2hs_spec_in-file.dpatch Description: Binary data -

Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] remove gtk2hs.spec

2010-05-06 Thread Andy Stewart
Hi Jens, Jens Petersen writes: > On 5 May 2010 21:50, Andy Stewart wrote: >> For demos under "gtk2hs/demo", we need move "gstreamer" to >> "gstreamer/demo", and move rest demos to "gtk/demo" > > Or alternatively making "gtk2hs/demo" into a separate "gtk2hs-demos" > cabal package say > might be

Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] remove gtk2hs.spec

2010-05-06 Thread Jens Petersen
On 5 May 2010 21:50, Andy Stewart wrote: > For demos under "gtk2hs/demo", we need move "gstreamer" to > "gstreamer/demo", and move rest demos to "gtk/demo" Or alternatively making "gtk2hs/demo" into a separate "gtk2hs-demos" cabal package say might be better and more portable? Well personally I

Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] remove gtk2hs.spec

2010-05-05 Thread Andy Stewart
Hi Jens, Jens Petersen writes: > I think the rpm spec is long overdue... and > >acinclude.m4 config.guess config.sub install-sh missing > > should also be removed? (or made .stale?) Looks need remove many unnecessary files when released. Now just let those old files stay there, we will clea