On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:11 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>
> > We could just unref the underlying object, but once the wrapping C++
> > object has been destroyed, the vfuncs (and default signal handlers) will
> > fall back to default C implem
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> We could just unref the underlying object, but once the wrapping C++
> object has been destroyed, the vfuncs (and default signal handlers) will
> fall back to default C implementations, if any, and this could even
> cause different UI beha
On Sun, 2010-09-26 at 16:08 +0200, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> - GtkObject is gone
> With the existance of GObject, GtkObject became unnecessary. The
> functions it provided are now either part of GObject or GtkWidget.
For gtkmm, I welcome this for the little GtkAdjustment, GtkFileFilter
and GtkRecent
