On 2019-02-14 10:39, Daniel Boles via gtkmm-list wrote:
Btw, if anyone in this latest thread doesn't know yet, you can
substitute 3.20 into the URLs for documentation pointing at
3.22/3.24/stable and usually set something that's *almost* relevant,
although 3.20 is increasingly old.
Failing
Btw, if anyone in this latest thread doesn't know yet, you can substitute
3.20 into the URLs for documentation pointing at 3.22/3.24/stable and
usually set something that's *almost* relevant, although 3.20 is
increasingly old.
Failing that, hopefully your package manage installed the
I am also frustrated with the documentation available for gtkmm. I
have to instead look into gtk docs and try to guess the equivalent
gtkmm code. If possible I could also help in doing anything necessary
or automating the whole process document generation.
Regards,
Compro
On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at
> This is already reported at
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/library-web/issues/12 (among
> 10s of other duplicates in an issue list that it seems no one is
> maintaining)
What is most worrying is that it seems to be next to impossible to
reach anyone responsible for the GNOME web
This is already reported at
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/library-web/issues/12 (among 10s of
other duplicates in an issue list that it seems no one is maintaining)
___
gtkmm-list mailing list
gtkmm-list@gnome.org
