Re: Backward compatibility

2005-04-28 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 08:43 -0300, Alfredo Kojima wrote: Hi I have written a couple of tools using gtkmm-2.2, but wanted to update to gtkmm-2.4 Problem is that some distributions ship 2.4, some ship 2.2 and I suppose that soon, some will start shipping 2.6 (or 2.8). Furthermore, it seemed

RE: Backward compatibility

2005-04-28 Thread Foster, Gareth
Don't worry about distros that don't ship gtkmm-2.4. They should not be taken seriously. To add weight to this, and give an example, I was looking at *mm packages for Fedora last night, and whilst at one point, getting these packages had been a problem, it seems that now gtkmm is gaining

Re: Backward compatibility

2005-04-28 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:05 -0300, Alfredo Kojima wrote: :) The problem is that even decent distros will not have 2.4 if they're not reasonably recent and I need to support them, since they're often common in many companies... That's life. Use whatever version your target platform has, or can

Re: Backward compatibility

2005-04-28 Thread John Taber
We appreciate the new releases. But based on several other posts here, I think a web page that shows a more detailed listing of all the g* lib requirements for each gtkmm release would be most helpful - with a bunch of gtk and gtkmm releases, and different availability on different distros, it

Re: Backward compatibility

2005-04-28 Thread Murray Cumming
On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 09:55 -0600, John Taber wrote: We appreciate the new releases. But based on several other posts here, I think a web page that shows a more detailed listing of all the g* lib requirements for each gtkmm release would be most helpful - with a bunch of gtk and gtkmm