Hallo Armin.
Thanks a lot for your response.
1. In Visual-C++ the _SECURE_SCL-flag enables some special security
checks within the STL-Container-templates. This means among others that
the base-classes for all iterators get an additional member, a pointer
to the referenced container. This poi
On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 11:11 +0200, Thomas Frank wrote:
> Hallo Armin.
>
> Thanks a lot for your response.
>
> 1. In Visual-C++ the _SECURE_SCL-flag enables some special security
> checks within the STL-Container-templates. This means among others
> that the base-classes for all iterators get an a
On Sat, 2008-10-18 at 16:30 +0200, Maik Beckmann wrote:
> 2008/10/18 Armin Burgmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 16:05 +0200, Thomas Frank wrote:
> >> I searched for _SECURE_SCL in the archives but didn't get any results.
> >> Has this ever been a topic?
> >
> > I didn't even kno
2008/10/18 Armin Burgmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 16:05 +0200, Thomas Frank wrote:
>> I searched for _SECURE_SCL in the archives but didn't get any results.
>> Has this ever been a topic?
>
> I didn't even know this option existed. Of course, we could enable this
> for the gtk
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 16:05 +0200, Thomas Frank wrote:
> Hallo.
>
> I'm trying to introduce gtkmm (also) on windows as GUI to my non-GUI
> libraries. As many other users of Visual C++ I need to #define
> _SECURE_SCL=0 for the Release-versions of my libraries and any
> application that uses them
Hallo.
I'm trying to introduce gtkmm (also) on windows as GUI to my non-GUI
libraries. As many other users of Visual C++ I need to #define
_SECURE_SCL=0 for the Release-versions of my libraries and any
application that uses them, to ensure a satisfying performance of the
STL-containers.
It
