On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Marina Zhurakhinskaya
marina...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Marina,
The majority of the board voted for the long version of the code of
conduct for GUADEC to be posted. We really appreciate all the work
done by the organizers, but people who voted in favor feel
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:13:01PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
I've discussed this in private one-to-one conversations with several
organization team members and everyone is uncomfortable with having
such a policy.
I'm uncomfortable attending a conference run by people who feel
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
I'm uncomfortable attending a conference run by people who feel
uncomfortable with having such a policy. Such policies have proven more
effective than generic Be friendly policies in creating an atmosphere
of safety,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:57:27PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
Have you been to FOSDEM?
Not since I started caring about conferences having useful CoCs.
Have there been complaints about the FOSDEM policy not being enough or
people boycotting the FOSDEM because of the lack of a stronger
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org
wrote:
You're using an argument that's been rightfully dismissed when used
the other way around. If harassment was such a big problem, I would
have heard about it.
We've had to adopt CoCs for a few different groups
Sorry, my previous email contained the wrong attribution for the quote
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 03:57:27PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
You're using an argument that's been rightfully dismissed when used
the other way around. If harassment was such a big problem, I would
have heard about
On 14 July 2014 14:08, Matthew Garrett mj...@srcf.ucam.org wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 12:13:01PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
I've discussed this in private one-to-one conversations with several
organization team members and everyone is uncomfortable with having
such a policy.
I'm
First of all, I'm pretty sure nobody in this discussion said there
should be no policy *at all*. There seems to be a misunderstanding
that this discussion is between those for a policy vs those against
any form of policy and it is not. Maybe those advocating a strong
policy could use a moment to
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 05:22:07PM +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
First of all, I'm pretty sure nobody in this discussion said there
should be no policy *at all*. There seems to be a misunderstanding
that this discussion is between those for a policy vs those against
any form of policy and it
