FWIW, another option may be:
https://github.com/chrisjrn/symposion/
+
https://github.com/chrisjrn/registrasion/
I saw a website run by it this weekend that looks pretty neat:
https://2017.northbaypython.org/
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:24 AM, Ekaterina Gerasimova <
kittykat3...@gmail.com>
On 21 October 2017 at 01:50, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> Hola Tobi!
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:54 AM Tobias Mueller
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 01:26 +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
>> > LAS is looking to move to a new conference
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Last time I used OSEM, it wasn't as straight forward to use as I would
> have hoped.
> Maybe it makes sense to take it for a trial run for LAS and then see if
> it makes sense to recommend it for the other
On 2017-10-20 03:26, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> LAS is looking to move to a new conference software. We would like to
> move to OSEM (http://osem.io/). I realize there was some talk about
> using whatever FOSDEM is using, but honestly that software is 8 years
> old and nobody supports it. There
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 19:41 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Tobias Mueller > e> wrote:
>> As far as I know, the schedule format was defined by Pentabarf and
Hi.
On Sat, 2017-10-21 at 19:41 +0200, Alexandre Franke wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Tobias Mueller e> wrote:
> As far as I know, the schedule format was defined by Pentabarf and
> nowadays many other applications implement it
Including OSEM? ;-)
> There are
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Tobias Mueller wrote:
> Hi.
Hello,
> What software are you talking about?
He was talking about Pentabarf.
> Frab? I don't have the impression that it's neither unmaintained nor not
> supported. In fact, it sets standards when it comes
Hola Tobi!
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:54 AM Tobias Mueller
wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 01:26 +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> > LAS is looking to move to a new conference software. We would like to
> > move to OSEM (http://osem.io/). I realize there was some
Hi.
On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 01:26 +, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
> LAS is looking to move to a new conference software. We would like to
> move to OSEM (http://osem.io/). I realize there was some talk about
> using whatever FOSDEM is using, but honestly that software is 8 years
> old and nobody
LAS is looking to move to a new conference software. We would like to move
to OSEM (http://osem.io/). I realize there was some talk about using
whatever FOSDEM is using, but honestly that software is 8 years old and
nobody supports it. There is 5-6 dedicated people for OSEM. So, I'm
hoping to
10 matches
Mail list logo