On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, at 07:13 AM, Mark Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, at 05:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> > Where did STATUS_OK come from, or is that just a typo?
>
> "Typo" implies just a typing error. I think I was having a synapse
> segfault and kept thinking the name was
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017, at 05:41, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> Where did STATUS_OK come from, or is that just a typo?
"Typo" implies just a typing error. I think I was having a synapse
segfault and kept thinking the name was STATUS_OK instead of STATUS_ON.
My apologies for the confusion.
Also,
Nathan of Guardian:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 10:11 AM, Mark Murphy wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2017, at 10:07, Nathan of Guardian wrote:
>>> Otherwise, yeah, waiting a little bit for all the processes to spin up
>>> is not a bad idea.
>>
>> Should Orbot send out STATUS_OK before the
