Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
Hi all,
We have breakpoints now:
Nice!
Neil
On Sat 18 Sep 2010 23:50, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libunistring/2010-09/msg4.html
The conclusion is that we’d better use raw ‘iconv’ calls in such
cases...
Boo. I guess this is a 2.0 blocker. Bruno's strategy appears (as usual)
to be
Hi Julian,
On Sun 19 Sep 2010 02:20, Julian Graham jool...@gmail.com writes:
(define (record-internal? obj)
-(and (struct? obj)
- (let* ((vtable (struct-vtable obj))
- (layout (symbol-string
- (struct-ref vtable vtable-index-layout
-
Hey Andy,
Is it possible to keep the current flat record layout, and change this
check to be:
(define (record-internal? obj)
(and (struct? obj)
(eq? (struct-vtable (struct-vtable obj))
record-type-vtable)))
What kind of performance do you get there?
I'm
Hi,
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Sat 18 Sep 2010 23:50, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-libunistring/2010-09/msg4.html
The conclusion is that we’d better use raw ‘iconv’ calls in such
cases...
Boo. I guess this is a 2.0 blocker.
Hi Alex,
Alex Shinn alexsh...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:12 PM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
[...]
I do! :-)
http://git.sv.gnu.org/cgit/guile-rpc.git/tree/modules/rpc/compiler.scm#n312
Well it uses only ‘..1’. The same code would work with ‘..1’ replaced
by
