Hi Jao,
You can send it to me, that's fine. I'll put a repo on gitorious and
add that code there together with my suggested alternatives.
Regards
Stefan
On Monday, November 29, 2010 12:24:28 am Jose A. Ortega Ruiz wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29 2010, Stefan Israelsson Tampe wrote:
[...]
I
On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
[ It's off-topic in this thread, but I think the circular dependencies
introduced by using `@' and `@@' in the R6RS modules should at one
point be eliminated; they work almost all the time, but can fail in
surprising
On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
to not lose current functionality, `print-exception' and exception
printer procedures would need a `frame' argument as well, right?
I guess. I never liked that, though; sounds like a needless tangling of
concerns. What does
Ok I put the code in a repo of it's own.
So now this thingie is isolated.
I don't now what to do about the licesning, I kept
the COPYING as I should though.
To use it, store it in a %load-path directory
try
(use-modules (scsh syntax))
and then
(run (| (begin (pk 'wow) (pk 'vov)) (grep o)))
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
[ It's off-topic in this thread, but I think the circular dependencies
introduced by using `@' and `@@' in the R6RS modules should at one
point be eliminated; they work almost all the
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
On Sat 27 Nov 2010 01:08, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
to not lose current functionality, `print-exception' and exception
printer procedures would need a `frame' argument as well, right?
I guess. I never liked that, though; sounds like a
