On Tue 22 Mar 2011 14:26, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
If you run (exit) at the repl, it is caught, and any after-thunks from
dynamic-wind will be called when you continue with ,q . However, in a
guile script, it is not an error, and the after-thunks are not
called.
I have
Hi Andreas!
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
Could you send a patch to update the manual?
I have started working on this,
Great!
but I'm notorious (at least to myself) for starving
documentation-related work with interesting coding
Hello,
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
I think it would make sense to include ‘fmt’ in core Guile only if the
API is reasonably stable and there are infrequent upstream releases, so
we don’t quickly end up shipping an old incompatible
On Fri 18 Mar 2011 22:16, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
The problem is that modules are resolved at compile-time, in addition to
run-time, so there just can’t be circular dependencies.
It's true that a module couldn't depend, at compile-time, on a module
that was only available
Hi Andreas,
I’m all for your suggestion.
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
+ (define-syntax define-fxop*
+(syntax-rules ()
+ ((_ name op)
+ (define name
+ (case-lambda
+((x y)
+ (assert-fixnum x y)
+ (op x y))
+(args
+
Hi!
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
+SCM_DEFINE (scm_fixnum_p, fixnum?, 1, 0, 0,
+(SCM x),
+Return @code{#t} if @var{x} is a fixnum, @code{#f} otherwise.)
+#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_fixnum_p
+{
+ return scm_from_bool (SCM_I_INUMP (x));
+}
+#undef
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi Andreas,
I’m all for your suggestion.
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
+ (define-syntax define-fxop*
+(syntax-rules ()
+ ((_ name op)
+ (define name
+ (case-lambda
+ ((x y)
+(assert-fixnum x y)
+
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi!
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
+SCM_DEFINE (scm_fixnum_p, fixnum?, 1, 0, 0,
+(SCM x),
+Return @code{#t} if @var{x} is a fixnum, @code{#f} otherwise.)
+#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_fixnum_p
+{
+ return
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I have pushed something that causes the stack to be unwound before
exiting. Please let me know if you still see problems.
Unfortunately, yes. Now when snarf-check-and-output-texi is run, I see:
| GENguile-procedures.texi
| guile: uncaught throw to
