David Pirotte da...@altosw.be writes:
Le Sun, 26 Jun 2011 22:15:23 +0200,
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at a écrit :
...
The solution (other than just removing the offending .la files) would be to
re-build and re-install all software depending on libgc-dev, including
g-wrap, as to get
Hi,
On Fri 29 Apr 2011 17:16, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I have a branch that fixes literal matching to actually compare toplevel
bindings, as the RNRS suggest, rather than simply assuming that a
literal that is not lexically bound can be compared symbolically.
In the end I think
I think we should add `when' and `unless' to the default environment.
They go like this:
(define-syntax when
(syntax-rules ()
((_ test then then* ...)
(if test (begin then then* ... (if #f #f))
(define-syntax unless
(syntax-rules ()
((_ test else else* ...)
Hi!
On Thu 21 Apr 2011 17:56, Wolfgang J Moeller w...@heenes.com writes:
btw., in R6RS and this latest pre-R6RS 'psyntax', the first argument
to datum-syntax must be an identifier, not an arbitrary syntax
form. Permitting the latter in the old 'psyntax' might have been a
mistake ... I've
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for looking at the patch!
On Thu 30 Jun 2011 03:24, Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
After some thinking, the base thing to do is just to add a warning port,
and make warnings (non-fatal informative messages) write to that
On Sat 02 Apr 2011 17:25, Dmitry Dzhus d...@dzhus.org writes:
Also similar error when building without dynamic modules support:
CCLD libguile-2.0.la
CCLD guile
./.libs/libguile-2.0.so: undefined reference to `scm_dynamic_link'
./.libs/libguile-2.0.so: undefined reference to
Hi nalaginrut,
On Thu 14 Apr 2011 12:05, nalaginrut nalagin...@gmail.com writes:
I found the manual said %load-hook is used by all of the above loading
functions (load,load-path, primitive-load and primitive-load-path).
But it seems only primitive-load according to it.
Fixed, thanks for the
Hi Mark,
On Mon 25 Apr 2011 21:49, Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com writes:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
your patches should be atomic
3. No patch introduces a regression: after applying any
initial part of the series, the resulting project still
Hi!
A bit late, but...
On Fri 15 Apr 2011 00:17, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Dmitry Dzhus d...@dzhus.org writes:
Is POSIX module considered optional?
Not really.
Configuring guile-2.0 and git trunk with --disable-posix results in the
following error on my x86:
I pushed a
On Fri 20 May 2011 15:47, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
Andy Wingo writes:
I don't much like this approach. Besides mixing in a heuristic on all
machines that is win32-specific, it makes c:/foo.scm collide with
d:/foo.scm in the cache, and fails to also modify load.c which also
Hello!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com skribis:
I think we should focus on the GNU system, using gnulib to adapt other
systems to look like GNU. Disabling POSIX bindings helps no one on the
GNU system -- if the question is one of library size, the solution
should be loadable modules, not
Hi :)
On Thu 30 Jun 2011 16:17, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
I think the compile-time option can be useful when building on a “raw”
or old system, which doesn’t support all the POSIX bits we wrap, or on a
slow system.
But we check for all of the bits we do wrap, no? It seems to me
Hi Andy,
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com skribis:
After some thinking, the base thing to do is just to add a warning port,
and make warnings (non-fatal informative messages) write to that port.
I have done this in the attached patches. Any objections?
Ideally I’d preferred to keep
Hi!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com skribis:
4) Our fluids currently have problems with threads: if a thread not
spawned by a Guile thread enters Guile, its fluids are bound to
#f. This should be fixed; in the meantime though we hack around
that with the (or ...) clause, which
Hello comrade!
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com skribis:
I think we should add `when' and `unless' to the default environment.
[...]
These are pretty uncontroversial
What?!
http://lists.r6rs.org/pipermail/r6rs-discuss/2007-March/thread.html#1856
Here’s another argument: these macros are about
15 matches
Mail list logo