David Kastrup writes:
> Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> Sure, but things like gensym and make-prompt-tag (and (list '()) for
>>> creating an eq?-unique object) are artificial hygiene coming at a cost
>>> in symbol table and symbol generation time rather than "lexical"
>>> hygiene. They n
David Kastrup writes:
> Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> Sure, but things like gensym and make-prompt-tag (and (list '()) for
>>> creating an eq?-unique object) are artificial hygiene coming at a cost
>>> in symbol table and symbol generation time rather than "lexical"
>>> hygiene. They n
I wrote:
> pad (within definition of 'syntax-case' core form)
Actually, this one is clearly a bug on line 2454 of psyntax.scm.
It should be #'pat instead of #'pad.
Mark
I wrote:
> The last patch is new. It minimizes the wraps of the embedded syntax
> objects in psyntax-pp.scm, such that they can no longer be used as the
> first argument to 'datum->syntax' but are otherwise equivalent. (The
> resulting syntax-objects are the same as those returned by
> 'locally-b
Noah Lavine writes:
> Hello,
>
>> Sure, but things like gensym and make-prompt-tag (and (list '()) for
>> creating an eq?-unique object) are artificial hygiene coming at a cost
>> in symbol table and symbol generation time rather than "lexical"
>> hygiene. They need _extra_ work, whereas the
>>
