On 19 September 2012 03:59, Chris K. Jester-Young wrote:
> (define* (regexp-split pat str #:optional (limit 0))
> […]
> (reverse (if (zero? limit)
> (drop-while string-null? final)
> final
>
Please simplify this limit arg, removing the maybe-drop-empty-st
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> As I understand it, the reason given for why we cannot use that approach
>> is that 'libtool --mode=execute -dlopen' would not work properly,
>
> Exactly.
>
>> but why do we have to do it that way?
>
> It is a fact that some proj
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>>
>>> Following Bruce's suggestion, it causes 'sysdep_dynl_link' to manually
>>> search additional directories if 'lt_dlopenext' fails to find the
>>> library in the default paths.
>>
>> Thus, that do
I wrote:
> I've read the message referenced above several times, but I've failed to
> understand why we cannot use 'lt_dladdsearchdir' to augment the path, as
> shown in the first code excerpt of that message:
>
> env = getenv ("GUILE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS_PATH");
>
> [...]
>
> if (env)
> lt_
Jan Synacek writes:
> when I run 'make check', some guile tests fail and I'm not sure why [1, 2].
>
> [1] http://jsynacek.fedorapeople.org/guile/check-guile.log
> [2] http://jsynacek.fedorapeople.org/guile/check-guile-fails.log (only FAILs)
Quoting from [2] (but rearranging the order somewhat):
