Section 2.1 of the R7RS (draft 6) explicitly says "The #!fold-case
directive causes the read procedure to case-fold [...] each identifier
and character name subsequently read from the same port."
Here's the relevant excerpt:
The following directives give explicit control over case folding.
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>> My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
>>> something, no?
>>
>> The implementation they have (which they call a "demo") reimplements the
>> entire reader from
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi Mark!
>
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> [...]
>
>>> Of course. I just meant that, if you can call ‘make-reader’ with
>>> whatever options you’re interested in, instead of globally changing the
>>> reader’s optio
Marijn writes:
> ``Regular expressions crammed into string-syntax'' really needs to be
> deprecated in Scheme implementations. SRE[1][2] is more expressive and
> doesn't suffer from such exceptions.
I wholehearted agree that SRE is far superior, and that we should
implement SRE and strongly encou
Hi Mark!
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
>> Of course. I just meant that, if you can call ‘make-reader’ with
>> whatever options you’re interested in, instead of globally changing the
>> reader’s option as is currently the case, then you’re halfway throug
Hi,
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
>> something, no?
>
> The implementation they have (which they call a "demo") reimplements the
> entire reader from scratch. There are several problems with t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 18-10-12 11:44, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote:
>> As documented in "Syntax of Regular Expressions" of the Emacs
>> manual (to which section 6.15 of the Guile manual refers):
>>
>> To include a `]' in a character set, you must make it the first
>> char
On Tue, 2012-10-16 at 16:38 -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> > My understanding was that the sweet-expressions folks already had
> > something, no?
>
> The implementation they have (which they call a "demo") reimplements the
> entire reader from scratch. Ther
