We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.9, the next maintenance
release for the 2.0.x stable series.
This release contains 347 commits by 15 people over 4 months.
The Guile web page is located at http://gnu.org/software/guile/ .
Guile is an implementation of the Scheme programming
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
Another way to think about it is: A ‘sendfile/all’ can be implemented in
terms of a ‘sendfile/non-looping’ but not the other way around.
So overall, i think hiding partial i/o is a mistake. This is just one
instance of that, it seems (‘write’ and
Sound very exciting.
Congratulations on the great work that continues to be done on Guile.
Best wishes,
Alex
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
We are pleased to announce GNU Guile release 2.0.9, the next maintenance
release for the 2.0.x stable series.
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org skribis:
So overall, i think hiding partial i/o is a mistake.
Well, I sympathize with the idea of sticking to the underlying syscall
semantics; yet, for my own uses of ‘sendfile’, I can only think of cases
all I want is to send the file.
(Besides, it seems to
After the array-map patches, I've gone through the vector/array implementation
and there's some stuff I'd like to fix. In stable-2.0 today:
(define a (make-typed-array ''f64 0 '(1 2))
a
= #1f64@1(0.0 0.0)
so far so good.
(uniform-vector? a)
= #t
(f64vector-ref? a)
= #t
so far so good.
There is a neat command-line option in GHCi (i.e., :!). It allows to
run programs from the interpreter. For example:
$ ghci
Prelude :! echo foo
foo
I decided to add a similar option to Guile. I've attached my attempt.
I wasn't sure which version (branch) to use; I used 2.0.7. Also, I
didn't
So, what do you think?
This is the sort of thing that belongs in a .guile rather than in
guile IMO.
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
Programming is like pinball. The reward for doing it well is
the opportunity to do it again - from The Wizardy Compiled
