Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

"Thompson, David" skribis: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > >> On a more general topic, IIUC Artanis is not an “application” but a >> library so maybe it is not a good idea to include it in (index-page) >> since it uses the term

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

On 5 November 2015 at 20:58, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > GDB! What would the associated picture be? A brass clockwork cockroach! -- William Leslie Notice: Likely much of this email is, by the nature of copyright, covered under copyright law. You absolutely MAY reproduce any part

New web site is live!

Hey Luis, Not sure if you’ve seen it, but it’s live! http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ And people seem to like it. :-) Andy installed the new site as he was telling the world about the awesome 2.1.1! Thanks again for the super cool web site! Ludo’.

Re: Mark procedures

Andy Wingo skribis: > Some of the points I made have not been made before, AFAIK. The point > about marking occuring concurrently with the mutator even in the absence > of threads, for example. Yes, right. >> I agree with you that we must keep recommending against using [mark

Re: New web site is live!

The new Web site at http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/ looks nice. I'm puzzled, however, why two of the examples are complexified by using a final call to (newline) instead of representing that character by "\n" at the end of the preceding output string.

Re: Mark procedures

On Thu 05 Nov 2015 11:29, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > I think we all agree that mark procedures suck in many ways, so that’s > not the problem. :) Some of the points I made have not been made before, AFAIK. The point about marking occuring concurrently with the mutator even in the

Foreign object API

Mark H Weaver skribis: > Deprecating and replacing the SMOB API is a significant event in the > history of Guile. It should not be rushed, nor should it be finalized > until it supports existing use cases and anticipated future > developments. Agreed. > As an aside, I'm not

Re: Mark procedures

Hello! I think we all agree that mark procedures suck in many ways, so that’s not the problem. When I ported the old Guile to BDW-GC, I kept them mostly so existing code that uses SMOB can still work as expected. Of course, 90% of the time you could just remove them and things would work, but

[PATCH] gnu: guile: Add guile-irregex.

Irregex, packaged for Guile! Horray! On a side note, it would really be nice to have a r6rs-build-system... starting to result in a lot of similar spaghetti in a few of these packages. I don't know how that works though, so consider that a research project for another day. >From

Re: [PATCH] Add SRFI-25 implementation

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis: > Andreas Rottmann skribis: > >> Adds an implementation of SRFI 25 on top of Guile's native arrays. The >> implementation does not introduce a disjoint type; Guile arrays and >> SRFI-25 arrays can be used interchangably, though with

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

On 2015-11-05 04:58, l...@gnu.org wrote: "Thompson, David" skribis: On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: On a more general topic, IIUC Artanis is not an “application” but a library so maybe it is not a good idea to include it in

Replace Sly on the website main page? (was: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page)

Luis Felipe López Acevedo writes: > On 2015-11-05 04:58, l...@gnu.org wrote: [...] >> GDB! What would the associated picture be? >> > > GDB, The GNU Project Debugger? It has a mascot: > > https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/mascot/ > > Someone on #guile also suggested

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > "Thompson, David" skribis: >> What should we put in its place? > > GDB! What would the associated picture be? I'm fine with adding GDB. What about adding its current mascot? Another solution would be to make a zoomed

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

On 2015-11-04 13:49, Nala Ginrut wrote: Hi folks! Our new main site really rock, right? I believe that we may add more to "Applications using Guile". Here's mine, the entry of GNU Artanis. Attached the patch. Happy hacking! I added Artanis to the libraries page. The change will be visible

Re: Replace Sly on the website main page? (was: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page)

On 2015-11-05 17:22, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: Luis Felipe López Acevedo writes: On 2015-11-05 04:58, l...@gnu.org wrote: [...] GDB! What would the associated picture be? GDB, The GNU Project Debugger? It has a mascot: https://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/mascot/

Re: [PATCH] gnu: guile: Add guile-irregex.

Christopher Allan Webber writes: > Irregex, packaged for Guile! Horray! > > On a side note, it would really be nice to have a > r6rs-build-system... starting to result in a lot of similar spaghetti in > a few of these packages. > > I don't know how that works though, so

Re: [PATCH] Added Artanis info to new main page

On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 22:27 +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Also you have removed “Ragnarok”. if it is related to this change can > you explain it in the commit log otherwise please do a separate patch. > Now that Luis has updated to add Artanis to libraries, I think I don't have to send the

Re: Mark procedures, LilyPond, and backward compatibility

Hi :) I appreciate what you say. I do think that we are mixing topics a bit. Regarding the future applicability of the foreign object API to precise and moving GC -- this can be added. I have worked with precise and moving GC systems. During the time that I hacked on SpiderMonkey, it moved