> From: Andy Wingo
> Cc: m...@netris.org, guile-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:52:10 +0200
>
> On Sat 27 Aug 2016 10:23, Eli Zaretskii writes:
>
> > Ping! (2 weeks)
>
> Tx for the ping, and good idea! I ended up applying something
> similar -- I moved system* to posix.c, enabled
> From: Andy Wingo
> Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 11:46:19 +0200
> Cc: guile-devel
>
> Hah! Turns out we have been compiling in GCC's default mode the whole
> time, which is gnu11.
The default is version-dependent. Only GCC 5.x switched to gnu11,
previous versions used gnu90, AFAIK.
On 31 Aug 2016, at 11:46, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Wed 31 Aug 2016 11:28, Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Thu 14 Jul 2016 20:20, Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> I think the concerns are:
>>>
>>> (1) Do inlined definitions get inlined?
>>> (2) Are external definitions reified as well?
>>> (3) Do we avoid
From: Daniel Llorens
---
libguile.h | 1 -
libguile/Makefile.am| 2 --
libguile/__scm.h| 69 -
libguile/_scm.h | 1 -
libguile/array-handle.c | 3 +++
libguile/array-handle.h | 12 ++---
libguile/gc.c
On Wed 31 Aug 2016 11:28, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Thu 14 Jul 2016 20:20, Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> I think the concerns are:
>>
>> (1) Do inlined definitions get inlined?
>> (2) Are external definitions reified as well?
>> (3) Do we avoid reifying definitions in each compilation unit?
>> (4) C
Hi :)
Hope you had a good holiday.
On Thu 14 Jul 2016 20:20, Andy Wingo writes:
> I think the concerns are:
>
> (1) Do inlined definitions get inlined?
> (2) Are external definitions reified as well?
> (3) Do we avoid reifying definitions in each compilation unit?
> (4) Can you dlsym() an i
On Sat 27 Aug 2016 10:23, Eli Zaretskii writes:
> Ping! (2 weeks)
Tx for the ping, and good idea! I ended up applying something
similar -- I moved system* to posix.c, enabled it iff open-process was
available, and implemented in terms of open-process in a portable way.
Hopefully that should fi
