Re: more advanced bytevector => supervectors

hi, I think I am happe now with the API for binary operators, To see where I am heading, consider the bitvector implementation. Here is e.g. how logxor is implemented s1 logior s2 -> s2 (define (supervector-logxor! s1 s2) (supervector-binary ;; The general case logxor ;; The s1 part

Re: crash on macOS with dlsym RTLD_LOCAL

I have posted a message to Apple's forums to see if there's any luck: https://developer.apple.com/forums/thread/689991 Aleix On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 10:14 PM Aleix Conchillo Flaqué wrote: > > I did a little bit more research. The combination that actually fails > is RTLD_LAZY | RTLD_GLOBAL