Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-11-19 Thread Daniel Dinnyes
Sure. Apologies for my confusion / misunderstanding. On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 23:47, Maxime Devos wrote: > > > Op 18-11-2023 om 12:29 schreef Daniel Dinnyes: > > Hi Maxime, > > > > I am still not sure I understand what you meant. > > You've said you weren't referring to technical issue, but also

Re: Hygienic rewrite of (ice-9 expect)

2023-11-19 Thread Maxime Devos
Op 18-11-2023 om 12:29 schreef Daniel Dinnyes: Hi Maxime, I am still not sure I understand what you meant. You've said you weren't referring to technical issue, but also that you "get stuck in some vague loop of sorts and can't figure out what the maybe-issue is". Regarding what to do

Re: automake test driver for Guile scheme patch review

2023-11-19 Thread Maxime Devos
Op 19-11-2023 om 18:17 schreef Karl Berry: Hello Guile folk - back in May 2016, Mathieu Lirzin submitted a patch to add a test driver for Guile Scheme to Automake. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2016-05/msg0.html It was never committed. It's been seven+ years, so

Re: automake test driver for Guile scheme patch review

2023-11-19 Thread Freja Nordsiek
Dear Karl Berry and Guilers, I've been considering using Guile for a project as the next step after my initial proof of concept in shell script and very much would be using Automake's parallel-test harness, like this is for. The tests I am writing now would not change (run program, check

automake test driver for Guile scheme patch review

2023-11-19 Thread Karl Berry
Hello Guile folk - back in May 2016, Mathieu Lirzin submitted a patch to add a test driver for Guile Scheme to Automake. https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2016-05/msg0.html It was never committed. It's been seven+ years, so before doing so, I wanted to check if it was still