Hi Stefan,
This is definitely something that's of interest to me. Closures are one
of the great strengths of scheme, and have been very useful to me in the
past.
I'd love it for guile to have an "official" way to work with them,
including your load/save semantics. What's the format of the
to build industrial-strength applications in guile, it's
important to be able to answer questions such as what is causing my
process' memory usage to grow?
--
Andrew Gaylard
On 04/28/13 03:07, Daniel Hartwig wrote:
On 28 April 2013 03:57, Andrew Gaylard a...@computer.org wrote:
Those 0x304 values look dodgy to me, and explain why the
SCM_SETCDR causes an invalid memory access.
0x304 is SCM_EOL.
Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the feedback.
Are you saying that the 0x304
Hi guile hackers,
I'm experiencing the VM coring in a repeatable manner.
My application launches a number of threads, which pass objects
from one thread to another via queues (ice-9 q). To ensure thread-
safety, the queues are actually accessed via (container async-queue)
from guile-lib-0.2.2;
On 03/21/13 11:15, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com skribis:
I've thought for a while that if I had time (which I know I won't) I would
make a module called (linux) with bindings for non-POSIX Linux kernel
features. What do you think of this idea? If so, what do you
On 03/21/13 11:43, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Fri 15 Mar 2013 22:01, Brent Pinkney b...@4dst.com writes:
When I resume the continuation in another thread, all works perfectly
UNLESS the continued execution throws and exception.
Then guile exits with a core dump.
By contrast if I resume the
On 03/15/13 23:30, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Fri 15 Mar 2013 22:01, Brent Pinkney b...@4dst.com writes:
I am using partial continuations to resume a computation when an
external system returns with an answer.
I am using (call-with-prompt ...) and (abort-to-prompt)
When I resume the continuation in
On 03/05/13 23:14, Mark H Weaver wrote:
FYI, here's what I'm hoping to get into Guile 2.0.8.
Mark
2.0.8 TODO
==
* [SUBMITTED] Refactor pending numerics patches.
* [SUBMITTED] Implement Dybvig and Burger's algorithm for printing
floats.
* [NEEDS REVISION] Fix BOM handling.
[resending -- this time to the list. Sorry for the noise.]
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Thu 28 Apr 2011 17:33, Andrew Gaylard a...@computer.org writes:
With the attached patch, I can build and run guile-1.8.8 on Solaris.
It seems
Hi, I don't know if this is useful, but here's some more background...
The old code in guile-1.8.8/libguile/gc_os_dep.c used to do this:
# define STACKBOTTOM ((ptr_t) USRSTACK)
.. which is mentioned in the Solaris-10 headers...
$ find /usr/include/ | xargs grep USERLIMIT
Hi,
With the attached patch, I can build and run guile-1.8.8 on Solaris.
It seems that the old logic that used USRSTACK no longer works,
so I took it out.
Tested on Solaris 10u9, on both SPARC64 and x86_64.
- Andrew
--- guile-1.8.8/libguile/gc_os_dep.c.orig Mon Dec 13 19:25:01 2010
+++
Hi,
The attached patch implements the scm_init_guile function on Solaris.
The detection of the stack parameters is done via a new(ish) Solaris
function, stack_getbounds() -- see
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E19253-01/816-5168/stack-getbounds-3c/index.html
for details.
Tested on Solaris
12 matches
Mail list logo
