On Jan 12, 2009, at 19:04, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
union {
scm_t_cell cell[2];
double d_for_alignment;
long long ll_for_alignment;
}
The issue with this is that there's nothing telling us how compilers
should behave when encountering this. Even if the underlying hardware
has a preferred
Hi Ken,
Thanks for your reply.
Ken Raeburn raeb...@raeburn.org writes:
There's no portable way, but it might be a bit more likely to happen
if you try something like:
union {
scm_t_cell cell[2];
double d_for_alignment;
long long ll_for_alignment;
}
The issue with this is that
Hi!
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
I modified snarf.h in the BDW-GC branch to transparently have all
`SCM_SYMBOL ()' invocations use a statically allocated stringbuf. The
symbol itself still has to be interned then so for simplicity the
implementation statically allocates an
